• Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Man, there’s way more than 52.

      He’s gonna need a Magic: The Gathering like system for all those fuckers.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yeah, but I don’t think you’d even need to take out 52. After the first dozen or so, they’ll be more inclined to surrender their wealth and get off the list.

  • Korkki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Really highlights the fact that any free speech and naive western sense of freedom in these walled garden is just a button press away from being taken away and that there are no rules or standards. Whenever the owners or their friends feel even slightly displeased, annoyed or god forbid afraid the masks go off and the hammer falls.

      • TheEntity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sadly look at email. Technically you can host it yourself but if you’re not one of the 15 or so big providers, good luck not being marked as spam before you even do anything.

        The real problem is with the oligarchy controlling everything, service or protocol. This is why Threads was/is dangerous.

        • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          And they’ve been systematically shutting down anonymous email services.

          Load up Brave with a tor connection, and try to sign up for anonymous email. When they can’t track you reliably, even the “anonymous” services require a confirmation email or phone number.

          • TotalCourage007@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Man I don’t want a future where we doxx ourselves to just be on a PC. Its insane that parents think real ID for gaming is a good idea. Linux might be the only way to escape any of this in the near future.

            • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              They pretend it’s to protect us from illegal activity, but it’s really to protect them from whistleblowers.

              • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                That’s not entirely true. The push for KYC came because spam started going crazy. You have no clue how bad spam is right now. And believe me, you don’t know. Take the worst case scenario you can think of, and multiply that by 100, and that starts to describe the state of spam emails for the past decade.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Do protocols solve the problem of every hop in between you and the destination has to pass through what amounts to someone else’s private property? Some private servers owned by who knows who on the way between that we have no idea whether they’re inspecting every packet that comes through or not.

        Because that’s the bigger issue, and I’m not even sure it’s one we can solve, because it’s pretty important to how the internet functions.

        A protocol still has to be supported and passed through private corporations walled gardens.

        Who else remembers Comcast illegally using Sandvine to throttle bittorrent traffic specifically? Pepperidge Farm 'members.

        https://torrentfreak.com/comcast-throttles-bittorrent-traffic-seeding-impossible/

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Do protocols solve the problem of every hop in between you and the destination has to pass through what amounts to someone else’s private property?

          Yes. End-to-end encryption solves that.

          • TheEntity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Not even necessarily end-to-end, just encryption. And possibly encapsulation within an already allowed protocol, like it’s extremely common with HTTP these days.

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s what integrity checks are for, so that no one along the path can edit what you say before it actually gets published.

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            That’s rather missing the point, an integrity check doesn’t solve the fact that to communicate with anyone, you have to do it through giant corporations pipes.

            An integrity check doesn’t help when an ISP have straight blocked your protocols traffic, like Comcast previously did with bittorrent.

            Can we stop sucking down the preachings of an idiot like Jack Dorsey? We don’t actually have net neutrality, so it’s totally within their current rights to just block traffic they don’t like.

            • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Almost any protocol can be wrapped in any other protocol. You could, say, use bit torrent by encoding the packets and embedding the data in valid png files, then transporting them over http. As long as both sides understand the wrapping it’ll work just fine.

              I’ve even seen http tunneled over DNS queries in order to completely bypass firewalls.

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Having the suit one corner and the rank in the other is going to make these a bastard to play games with. How would you hold them in your hand so’s that you can see both?

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Honestly? That very much feels like a “fuck around and find out” situation and a GREAT way to piss off rich people in the event someone else gets blue shelled.

    Also: Free speech doesn’t apply to social media. You can and will be banned for no reason other than someone with the power was bored.

    • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      The site comrade workwear opens with them on the front page, i was curious what type of workwear they had after this article.

      I’m looking for a replacement for dickies and another one, their quality has been absolute ass lately. €100 work jeans that get holes in them in a matter of days, those are not work jeans anymore.