I mostly remember it as reporting abput random ass topics “transsexual ketamine dealers of Uruguay” type of stuff.
I mostly remember it as reporting abput random ass topics “transsexual ketamine dealers of Uruguay” type of stuff.
So instead of proactively working to make sure it’s not just Google contributing to Chromium (contributions that could go away if sold off), you think it would be better to just let the worst happen and then start doing something about it?
Do you realize how much modern web relies on Chromium and how much of that is done by Google currently? It’s a terrible idea to have it the way it currently is and probably even worse if Chrome is sold.
Also the idea of widening the contributor base helping the monopoly is sorta backwards.
This seems more a safeguard for if that happens, since Chromium project would be in jeopardy
I mean it is, but it’s also not a bad thing in moderation (heh)
Because people don’t go to the comments, they read the title on the front/subreddit page, sometimes vote and then move on.
A lot of the time there’s a comment correcting the title or article at the top though. Pros and cons with that system.
I trust that more than some random fact checkers tbh.
ziozuck
For a moment I thought I was on 4chan, I has real whiplash hah
For some, middle of the ocean can be a bit hard to reach. So I suggest a location of sister chains closer to the customer. I call it
Tim Shoreton’s
So here’s my pitch…
I wonder what the situation is with laptops. HDMI seems to be the standard and DP an additional thing that’s around sometimes, often through another port.
Do projectors commonly have DP or are they more often HDMI? I think TVs, screens and projectors having HDMI is the reason laptops have HDMI over DP.
TVs though. Overall HDMI has the lead but things can change ofc.
The AI being black queer mother of two just seems especially egregious. It’s like they’re just checking boxes with that stuff.
I’d say in Syria it was more militants and militaries doing the warfare rather than police, but that’s just my gut feeling, the police’s involvement might’ve been larger than I think
Syria’s numbers are literally from an active civil war
Doesn’t that make their numbers immediately questionable? Especially since what level of policing do you even have during a civil war
Could it be that that number came from active warfare with the gangs (which have now been neutered)?
Torille