• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Lol

      I respect the Chinese people, their modern advancements in science and technology, their industry, their customs, and their rich history and culture.

      I do not respect a hostile dictatorship that rules over them all, and if they were smart they would not, either.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          No it’s a dictatorship by a small group that the rest of them are not in. It’s a dictatorship that demands the common people surrender all beliefs not sanctioned by the state, that demolishes holy sites, a dictatorship that forces minorities into labor camps. It’s a dictatorship that commits hostile takeovers of neighboring nations and allies itself with multiple other dictatorships.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        I respect the American people, their modern advancements in science and technology, their industry, their customs, and their rich history and culture.

        I do not respect a hostile dictatorship of corporate overlords that rules over them all, and if they were smart they would not, either.

          • Allero@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            “Whataboutism” is a term used to feel righteous while completely ignoring your bias.

            Admitting both contries are bad and then taking a clear stance between them is hypocritical at best.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              “Whataboutism” is when you dismiss any bad of any one thing because there are other examples of bad things. In fact, you trying to deflect your bias as my bias is actually also whataboutism.

              If you don’t have any logical excuse for the bad thing, then you should stop standing up for the bad thing.

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            I was kinda making a similar argument because of “if they were smart”. They are smart. Americans are smart too. But being smart doesn’t trivialize the very complicated problems with overthrowing a dictatorship/oligarchy, because neither government is currently democratic in practice — so voting will not work.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Vote in 60 dem senators and they’ll overturn Citizens United, limiting political donations, and they’ll tax the rich.

          • Allero@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            Not really.

            Dems are primarily sponsored by the rich and have to align with their interests. Out of two major US political parties, neither one is the party of the people.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              HR 1 For The People Act - written by dems, passed by dems twice, blocked by Republicans.

              Before that the dems wrote the campaign finance laws in 1995 and 2002 which were the core of the Citizens United Lawsuit in 2007 where SCOTUS voted with a partisan split to allow any sized contribution, even Hillary Clinton was a supporter of undoing Citizens United.

              Even if the DNC isn’t your ideal peoples party, they are the party who can give you the option. Vote Dem.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    Keep it a note that having them listed as a Chinese military company could let US put pressure against open source groups to not collaborate with them; very similar to how US forced Linux Foundation to kick off decade old russian collaborators.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      That’s a bad mischaracterization. You cannot force someone to do something voluntarily . Torvald spoke in support of it. I’m sure many governments and groups using the Linux kernel and open source want Developers that are vetted. Or can be reasonably sure won’t be forced to act maliciously under duress.

      • tekato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        It is not a mischaracterization though. Open source projects can be forced to stop accepting contributions from employees of sanctioned companies, which would include Tencent employees if sanctioned. Anyways, Tencent is not being sanctioned here, so I guess it doesn’t really matter.

        Also, Linus was definitely forced to kick the Russian maintainers out by USA sanctions.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Force implies force. If you have evidence that it was actually done by force. Against Torvald’s etc will. Please share it. Otherwise get out of here with your gasslighting.

          Any project open source or otherwise can and does restrict contribution.

      • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        You cannot force someone to do something voluntarily

        Instantly disregarded. Completely boneheaded thing to say.

          • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            19 days ago

            Yeah, that’s right. I willfully pay rent and I willfully adhere to capitalism. No force used anywhere.

            Sorry you said something stupid and got mad when someone pointed it out :(

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 days ago

              Damn your projection is off the charts. But I mean it’s what we’ve come to expect from leninists. The childish Behavior I mean.

              Had I actually said anything stupid. Then you should have been easily able to refute it. Yet you can’t. You can’t even actually acknowledge or reply to anything that I said. Instead choosing to Make up things or imagine things that were never Said.

              BTW I’m an anarchist. I have no love for rent seeking leaches. Just as I don’t for capitalist/leninist hypocrites.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Not a Chinese Military company. At least at this moment. If and when Xi decides that they want to use information gathered from Tencent for military purposes, they will. Nobody can or will stop him.

    • egerlach@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Which documents, you say?

      What happened?

      Shredded, you say?

      How badly?

      To bits, you say? Oh my my…

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Sure, go ahead and try to sue the single most powerful entity on the planet.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        giving you the benefit of the doubt like maybe english isn’t your first language, that word is considered a pejorative/slur in all modern usage

          • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            Naw, it was most commonly used as a term similar to “that chinese guy” which is easy to confuse with racism at a time period where people were generally racist towards the chinese, but the term itself is not racist. There were actual slurs back then they could use if they were about that.

            My Grandmother said they always bought they’re vegetables growing up from the chinaman who rolled his cart through the alleyway behind their homes. It’s not a term of hate, but it’s easy to say hateful things alongside it.

            • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              19 days ago

              The people going around loudly policing other people’s language do more harm to leftist causes than good.

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        You know, you can be critical of a government without using racist slurs against the people from that country. Not everyone from China is part of the CCP.

      • L3s@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        Your submission in “Tencent says it’s not a Chinese military company and is willing to sue the US Department of Defense if it isn’t removed from a blacklist” was removed for Rule 3.

  • nyan@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Oh my, the US military might have to change the name of the list to, “Foreign companies we’re blacklisting for classified reasons”. How terrible.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    Sues. Lawyers do discovery. Tencent refuses. Court fines Tencent in contempt, rules in favor of the government. Tencent tries to bribe Trump with something.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    I agree with the US DoD. The large Chinese corporations are owned by CCP members and former PLA officers. Contain them until the PRC implodes.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        If the US goes China goes, the trade links are comparable to the late bronze age which ended when the trade links collapsed.

        • CharmOffensive@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Given the insane tariffs on Chinese goods and the fact that china is still thriving begs to differ.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Not to mention I’m pretty sure all of their Chinese office buildings are literally in Military owned and operated land.

      It would be like Google HQ being in the middle of a US military base.

      EDIT: Although I do admit adjacent the Googleplex building there is a Department of Defense building like 10 minutes drive, near the airfield, but it’s probably there because NASA operates on the airfield.