Ones with orchestras clearly.

Net negative, even. He even died while deflecting a question about gun violence.

Does not matter, all useless.

We’re talking about different things. This article is about Language Models. The discussion is about Language Model.

If you ask a language model via prompt to organize patterns and create models you will get slop that small children would recognize is wrong. It’s garbage.

Unlike vaccines, AI has no use case and is always a net negative.

Even if it’s only a receipt for 18,000 waters or it fills up a screen it costs them time and resources.

Every single AI halucinates, always has and always will. It’s useless for this.

I would definitely bet against that because the article states they’re not putting any AI in the drive through going forward.

The article quotes an executive saying they’re indeed backing down, just like McDonalds did the year before when they tried this.

Taco Bell doesn’t compete with mexican food, it competes with Jack in the Box and Taco Johns, perhaps anywhere that has a salad bar.

Because it costed them money, lol. The suits upstairs gave a quote in the article talking about how they will withdraw AI from all 500 locations they were implemented, and it also talks about how McDonalds did the exact same little dance over a year ago.

To the uninformed sure.

Nobody subsidizes on the same scale as what China is doing. Nobody operates entire market sectors at a loss for strategic advantage. The reason why China is doing this is because they’re comfortably in the lead among world powers and can afford to lose a bit, and also: everything is a weapon in their eyes, and they’re determined to use their weapons on everyone else.

EDIT: Although I do admit the Oil Industry is pretty equally cutthroat, Saudis weaponize crude and Russia weaponizes Natural Gas.

I mean

have you met the Chinese president for life? Feels like a really weird line you’ve drawn between acceptable and not acceptable.

I’m sure it’s got nothing to do with Elon Musk unironically promoting nazis.

I mean, Kick probably could be suspending people who stream for an unhealthily long time, maybe suspend his abusive friends, but they didn’t force him to take any actions resulting in his death imo.

What exactly is the crime?

Nobody is gonna watch a torrent tuber, the audience would get cut to 1/100th if even that.

Too many people rely on the aggregates and the algorithms.

TBH I think he’s just sending ships all over the world so nobody forgets that they’re his, like big toys. I wonder what it costs to run all of these fleets like this?

You appear to have misread

just as we should have the right to sue them if their AI crawlers make our site unusable and plagiarize our work to the effect of thousands of dollars, or even press charges for the criminal act of intentional disruption of services.

YOU caused google lost ad revenue

GOOGLE’s Crawlers have crippled sites

press charges for the criminal act of intentional disruption of services

That’s not a crime, and again reveals gaps in your knowledge on this topic.

We did

Don’t count your chickens before they hatch, Jimmy Wales founded Wikipedia and already used ChatGPT in a review process once according to this article.