A lot of countries require the equivalent of probable cause to do a cavity search before entering institutions like prisons, jails, or asylums as a prisoner or patient.

Lol, doesn’t read the summary, uses overly broad terms and then points the finger at someone else.

Are ya sure?

From the summary:

The activists, detained after a protest against Leonardo, an aerospace company, accused police of singling out women for this treatment.

Any other arguments that are D.O.A?

The point of the matter is the previous poster said that it was standard, my response proved it wasn’t.

If you read even the summary you will see that it wasn’t uniformly implemented.

From the same article

United States edit

In the United States, Bell v. Wolfish is the benchmark case on this issue. In its judgment of the case, the U.S. Supreme Court established a standard of reasonable grounds for performing cavity searches. Among these are security concerns at prisons. Such searches are generally governed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits searches without probable cause.[3]

Then why are they saying only the women had to do this?

Edit: I’ve never had a cavity search any of the times I have been arrested.

No.

Being captured could do that.

Dude, you have completely changed your previous comment any points you are now trying to make are null and void.

Dude, I’m not the one saying a racial slur (that has been recognized as such for over a century), isn’t one.

Cry harder.

Edit: love how you completely changed your comment. Doesn’t change the facts.

I’ve never heard my 100y/o grandpa ise racist slurs in my life.

Keep defending your racist grandma.

Yet as another commentor points out that its the opposite

Removed by mod

How are you this dense?

It’s never been anything but.

He’s trying to manufacture consent among his base.