- 2 Posts
- 12 Comments
No, as far as I am aware these are simply people that got significant traction on Mastodon today. Michael Stanclift is a contributor to Mastodon. This post is more me curating popular sentiment than expert opinion, though I recognize both are important.
31·3 months agobased
this but unironically. send them resources on how to transition smoothly to the fediverse.
Yes and it should be worse. OpenAI should be forced to take on the cost of compensating every copyright holder it exploited. If that means OpenAI doesn’t exist I’m absolutely okay with that.
please give me the lobbing machine 🙏
right?!? lol
i know mbfc isnt the best but: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/sludge/
Bias Rating: LEFT Factual Reporting: HIGH Country: USA MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
…so…. maybe? maybe its fine idk
“lobbing”
is this a trusted outlet? at least we can be pretty sure a human wrote it ha ha ha
more than half of visitors leave a page if they’re forced to wait longer than 3 seconds
and it’s not outlandish to suggest that length decreases every year.
i see this a lot but this is a misconception. “threadiverse” originally was a term to describe the “threaded fediverse” i.e. Reddit-like platforms like Lemmy and kbin. Bluesky and Threads are not threadiverse because they operate on the microblog model not the threaded link aggregation model. this usage has nothing to do with the then non-fediverse related Meta project “Threads” and can be seen predating it.
citations:
- June 14, 2023 first mention of “threadiverse” i can find https://lemmy.ml/post/1265079
- July 5, 2023 Meta announces Threads, reusing the name of a previously discontinued product https://about.instagram.com/blog/announcements/threads-instagram-text-feature
- March 21, 2024 Threads opens its integration to the fediverse https://engineering.fb.com/2024/03/21/networking-traffic/threads-has-entered-the-fediverse/
giving you the benefit of the doubt like maybe english isn’t your first language, that word is considered a pejorative/slur in all modern usage
slight off topic but trying to contribute positively
ooh its always so interesting to come across these. writing clear and effective english is a learned skill that isn’t the same as writing “correct” english. the author seems to rely heavily on indirect and passive phrases and poor preposition use which leads to a wandering feeling:
here’s the same quote, “fixed”:
it’s possible english isn’t the author’s first language, or they simply don’t have the communications education you are used to seeing in journalism. at least you know it’s not ai though :)