• ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️ cmon people, stop making netflix relevant

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    24 minutes ago

    Is there a way to poison the well so badly and so irrevocably that corporations won’t dare use generative AI for anything? Can we somehow trick these overgrown chatbots to speak ill of their masters in the form of direct-to-stream advertisements?

    • Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      31 minutes ago

      Rejecting Netflix fixes things for you and me, but the article says Netflix has 93 million ad-supported subscribers. I’m really worried about the amount of influence advertisers have on our society, and it’s only getting worse. Even if you and I can be above the direct influence of these ads, many people are not, and those people are influencing you and me. This produces a dangerous secondary influence that can reach most of society, and just fills everyone’s mind with lies, for hardly any cost.

  • essteeyou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I was looking to cut down on subscriptions and picked Netflix as an experimental one. I haven’t missed it at all. Things like this make me less likely to occasionally reactivate for a couple of months as I was originally planning.

    I wonder when they’ll see a big enough effect to break their current run of fucking over their customers.

    • dmention7@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I also thought I’d miss Hulu and Netflix a lot more than I do. What used to irk me so badly was how utterly shit Netflix is when you just want to sit down and find something new to watch. Their front page would be list after list of things like “Hot New Comedies” “Best Independent Films of 2025”, “Classic Action Flicks” and somehow it always felt like the same 30 or 40 movies randomly shuffled together. So I’d spend 15 minutes scrolling through the same slop in different orders, get frustrated and search for a movie that I remembered wanting to watch, only to find that it was on none of the services I was subscribed to, and cost $8.99 for a single watch of a 20 year old movie.

      We had been Netflix subscribers since the very start when they delivered discs through the mail. Kinda sad how they went from having virtually anything you could think of to watch (and having a halfway decent recommendation algorithm to boot!) to where they are today.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      My kids have missed it more than me (which I don’t) but they’re easy to distract with one of the other streaming services I still have. The last price hike did it for me.

      • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Eh, tbh it still does the core basics of streaming my content and Metadata management, so I don’t really care about enshitification of ‘extra’ features that I never use. It’s still the easiest way to share media

          • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Yes, because the core mechanics of their platform is media metadata management and streaming. As long as those work, and my users don’t have to pay anything (because I have a plex pass lifetime already), then it has no effect on me or my users.

            All that extra stuff can just be turned off.

              • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                Not quite. Only if users want to stream from a server that doesn’t have a plex pass, in which case the user needs a plex watch pass.

                If you (the server owner) have a plex pass, all users (even free accounts) can stream from you without a pass.

                If you (the server owner) do not have a plex pass, then the users need a plex watch pass to stream from you.

                Essentially, they’re making sure one side or the other has paid, but free to free is being stopped.

                Local stream isn’t affected by this either, only remote streaming. As someone who has had plexpass for 12 plus years, it doesn’t affect me or my users.

                • MBech@feddit.dk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  And lets be real here for a second. It costs actual money to develop and update Plex. All these people being butthurt about no longer being able to watch everything for free are entitled as fuck. It’s okay to pay developers for their time and expertise. A carpenter expects you to pay them. A painter also expects you to pay them. A software engineer expects to be paid for their work, and they won’t if people use their software for free. If you don’t want to pay for it, download your own shit, and if you’re hosting for a lot of users, tell all the users to download their own shit.

  • DeadNinja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The sooner people realize that the subscribers are nothing more than super-slow-boiled frogs to them, the better.

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Between that, price hike, and some weirdly low quality content because you don’t use this or that browser, netflix really wants people to stop their subscriptions it seems.

    • Ushmel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      99% of people won’t care besides passive complaining at the water cooler, unfortunately

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 hours ago

      High seas baby!

      There is surely a recognisable pattern here in which people leave because of this shit and to keep the flow of money going up they then have to further reduce quality by increasing ads.

      I deleted my facebook a few weeks ago and signing in for the first time in years gave a look at what it became and it was unrecognisable.

    • THB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yup, I’m finishing off a couple shows and it’s on the chopping block. Easy choice

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The only limitation on sailing the high seas is that the video and sound quality are not as great as legit streaming. You get descriptions that claim it is ripped full 4k or HD, but when actually looking at the encoding, it is not the case. But what can we do? If we are being made to stream in shit, it is better to sail in blue ocean high seas.

      • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s why you do several magnets, to be sure, and discard the ones that are bullshit, if you’re worried about that. Haven’t had any problems myself, other than theater cam for the newest new movies.

      • whaleross@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I hear a whisper in the wind about file size being a distinct though not foolproof hint of quality.

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I definitely look at the file size first. Although, as you already alluded to, sometimes it gets cheated with the resolution being cropped to either the top or side. And a major issue with downloading large file sizes is if you are unlucky enough that there aren’t many seeders.

      • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You are aware that Netflix et.al. put compression on their streams (usually quite a bit in regards to bitrate) ? It is often the case that BluRay rips etc. are available better on the high seas…

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        *only if you use the Netflix app on “supported platforms”

        I guess the answer to your question is to get on a private tracker for high-quality releases ;)

      • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        atmos and even dts x content are very findable and vlc has the codec information in the tool menu

        have a 5.1.4 system hooked up by hdmi to the igpu and the video to the gpu and it sounds just like the theater but be sure to check what is available for the content you are searching because it might not exist

        for example Harry Potter just got rereleased on dts x and the news was on the official dts site but also check blu-ray.com to see what formats exists

        the green for atmos comes on and the amber for dts does too as well as the white for dolby digital but again vlc confirms this too in the codec information and atmos for home theater will do for dolby digital too

        be prepared for enormous file sizes but so worth it and you will have to use the atmos for home theater or the dts x for home theater under the windows spatial sound settings per the content and yes switch back and forth

  • Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “[Netflix] members pay as much attention to midroll ads as they do to the shows and movies themselves,” Amy Reinhard, president of advertising at Netflix, said, per the publication.

    Amy, I want you to be honest with me, are you an alien.

    Because on planet Earth we do not, if fact, pay as much attention to the ads as to the things we’re actually interested in. Famously our brains even produce this fascinating effect to spare us from the bullshit you’re shoving into our eyeballs.

    • StarshotJohn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m just waiting for it to be like that Black Mirror episode where ads came on, the guy closed his eyes, and alarms went off until he opened them again.

      • SufferingSteve@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        The bad thing about those kind of shows, is that while most people see that as a warning, and something to avoid.

        Some people immediately start charting a path to how to make it a reality, and sometimes those people are very very smart and can chart a path that might take decades.

        I say this while on the toilet, writing on a device that has cameras both front and back, always on microphones and location sensors, and facial recognition and 3D scanning equipment.

        When the personalized condom ads start popping up, I will only be slightly annoyed.

      • SilverFlame@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This is exactly how I interpreted that statement. No one is paying attention, who cares if they slip some garbage ads in?