• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    161
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Meanwhile, American users are flocking to RedNote because authorities have worked themselves into a lather over privacy concerns about TikTok, while U.S. tech giants harvest user data with industrial efficiency. The difference? American data collection is done for profit, and Chinese data collection is done for control. Pick your poison.

    Hard to argue Zuck and Elon don’t want control either…

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 minutes ago

      The difference? American data collection is done for profit, and Chinese data collection is done for control. Pick your poison.

      No the difference is that these US companies give the US government a backdoor into everyone’s data (while also harvesting it all for profit) while the Chinese apps don’t in favor of giving the Chinese government a backdoor into everyone’s data. They don’t give a shit about propaganda and brainwashing occurring which is why they’ll allow the app to stay up in the US just so long as it’s an American company controlling it here because then they can install their backdoor for the US government.

    • coherent_domain@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      How do people not think that China is also a hyper capitalistic society, especially in the tech sector. Your data is 100% being sold if you are on any Chinese platform, just like in the U.S.

      If anything, Chinese big tech tends to be less privacy-respecting than the west, because they don’t need to operate in area with basic privacy laws, like Europe and California; and there are much less alternative products to choose from because of the GFW.

      The founder and CEO of Baidu openly stated that “Chinese people are less sensitive about privacy, which gives us more data to work with” See https://m.163.com/dy/article/DDRTB01Q0511FQO9.html?spss=adap_pc

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        They all operate under the same laws in any given area. And neither respect your privacy if not forced by laws that are actually enforced.

    • fan0m@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I’d argue profit and control are two sides of the same coin

      • ElderReflections@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        “In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the women.”

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Then when you get the power, then you get the women.”

          Then when you get the power you tell the plebs to make more money. “This is America. If you don’t make more money (for me), you’re a douchebag”.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Then, when all your desires are fullfilled, you realize that your life is empty because nobody around you actually gives a shit about you and are only using you as a connection to money and/or power. You end up a soulless husk of a human being whose only goal in life is line go up.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Honestly, if they all stopped trying to get more money or power at the point where they have all the women and luxuries they could ever want it would be a vast improvement over the status quo at this point.

    • kid2908@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The article talks about how America is mirroring China’s tactic. So yeah, now they want control too.

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      This is crystal clear now, but it was less clear before.

      I started saying that social media finally figured out how to monetize the platform and it’s customers aren’t people, aren’t even companies, the customers are now billionaires and foreign governments.

  • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The only winners in this scenario are governments that want more control over their citizens’ digital lives.

    And that, as the saying goes, is not a bug. It’s a feature.

    • Viri4thus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The same as when Americans posted about the gaza genocide on tik tok, the government cracks down.

      • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        18 minutes ago

        Really? Let me try.

        Hong Kong isn’t part of China. Taiwan is an independent country.

        Edit: oh, this community is in lemmy.world, not lemmy.ml. Still, for those disgruntled, report me for rule 2 & 6. I want to see how mods respond to this.

            • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              18 hours ago

              let’s assume that statement is true, let’s take the words of an anonymous internaut for truth :

              CIA paid Taliban too, i remember reading. Does that make Taliban too just propaganda?

              U.S. sponsored and sponsors many movements around the globe as long as their goals align. That money alone can’t invalidate the cause.

              Like, on the contrary, U.S. sponsorship can’t validate a cause either.

              i remember unsubscribing from political communities, why the heck am i responding to this comment at this hour. Completely futile! Will it change your mind? Do i really care what you will think about Tibet tomorrow?

              • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                U.S. sponsored and sponsors many movements around the globe as long as their goals align. That money alone can’t invalidate the cause.

                USSC declares money is speech. You not only agree, but go further that money is truth. Naziism and Islamist fascism is truth. Democracy, and political power, is much cheaper in smaller countries made less stable with US extortion and war. Navalny caught on video soliciting MI6 for funding to destabilize Russia. Hong Kong media mogul fomenting protests because of Americas values.

                The US empire’s values are extortion, control, puppetry, and war whitewashed/described with a facade of liberal freedom. Every country is to be a pawn for the empire to the detriment of their population. The political establishment’s disdain for Americans provides no valid expectation for the empire to promote humanism elsewhere. Just propaganda.

                • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 hours ago

                  That doesn’t make them propaganda. Tibet exists, I’ve been there. I have friends living there. The CIA paid for places to put listening equipment along China’s border. They did it in Cuba too. Is Castro propaganda?

                  You also deny that the Uyghurs are being disappeared and “reeducated”. The Uyghurs are being treated just like the First Nations people in America were. Their land and customs stand in the way of Chinese “progress”

                  Are you paid by China? Or are you just a useful idiot?

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I’d bet Chinese government WANTS people using these apps. They have established state control for rapid monitoring and data collection and rapid censorship and targeted groups for manipulation and propaganda.

    • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      The same thing that’s happening right now with Americans claiming Taiwan is not part of China.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I mean, trying to regulate technology at the speed of American politics was very obviously a nonsensical and futile proposition from the get-go.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Anyone that knows anything about average TT users knew that if the ban was going to happen, that this was going to happen in some way, shape, or form.

  • DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure Xiao Hong Shu translates to Little Red Note in English. I’m not using it, just clarifying the name to make it seem small / cute. Aduki beans are Xiao hong dou.

    • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      First of all, the name doesn’t translate to “Little Red Note”, but “Little Red Book.”

      Second, Little Red Book is literally the nickname of a Chinese political publication called Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung.

      Sorry, that name isn’t cute at all.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I think most people know it too. They protest because they have already got hacked a dozen or two times, advertisers steal all data not locked down, and the government scoops up all of that. So they question “what can China do to me that hasn’t already been done. My data and privacy has already been made worthless”

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yeah I hear a lot of people asking why it matters if someone has their data cause it must be worthless by now.
            I often think the governments wouldn’t be fighting this hard to track people if it was.