This is the question that should’ve been asked before it was built and shipped.

Now that it has been, though, any effort to keep it out of landfill and find a use for the hardware is good.

He does. And not one trained on a particularly good model, it has to be said.

Ok, so you meant Lemmy.

The person who asked the question is very well aware they are accessing Lemmy via an internet-connected device.

What does that have to do with asking if you can have a cloud-hosted Immich instance?

Additionally, how does it prove he’s a bot (which you have asserted) or that they’re a shill sent here, which you’ve also asserted?

I don’t know whether you yourself are a bot trained on a very bad model, or whether you’re simply extremely inebriated, because you’re not making much sense.

Get where? Lemmy?

What are you even talking about?

It’s perfectly possible someone doesn’t want to:

• Buy and run a whole separate PC

• Figure out how to install TrueNAS and configure it properly

• Install and configure Immich

• Figure out how to make it accessible outside of their home network while maintaining security

• Come up with an effective backup solution

• Do regular maintenance and replace hardware when required

Why are Lemmy users so incapable of realising others may have different preferences and priorities?

Not everyone can be arsed with the complexity or hours of work the above entails. Not everyone has the money for it.

I self host but I can definitely appreciate why people would prefer going a different route. It’d likely have saved me a lot of money, tbh.

Why is this a thing for US phone networks?

Why do they care whether the ones and zeroes sent/received stay on the phone or not? Data is data. It shouldn’t be any more complicated than that.

Bloody hell, this is a damn documentary.

Yeah, web browsers cost hundreds of millions per year to maintain, they’re mind-bogglingly complicated and costly.

I’d really hope the Linux Foundation would help contribute towards the budget, but LF is quite pro Chromium.

I don’t think end users can even come close to funding Firefox development, unfortunately.

Also their initiative to recognise images and generate alt-text for screen-reader users.

My sister is blind and screen readers are close to useless on the web, so it was great to hear Mozilla is working on that.

Seems like an interesting way to get people to slow down (people will want to time the melody not just hear a sudden clash of notes), but it’s a bit irritating to see an AI-generated article being posted here.

It’s frustrating to read this. Repetitive and verbose, like a student trying to pad out their homework to meet a word count.

It isn’t an OLED screen. It’s an E-ink one. I don’t know where you got this idea that it’s an OLED from.

TVs generally don’t come with unlocked bootloaders. That shit is locked down big time.

That would certainly be ideal, although there’s great difficulty in finding 50"+ monitors, and they cost a huge amount more

Sad people buy more to try to make themselves happy. Retail therapy.

People who serve ads have a vested interest in knowing when you’re unhappy and what makes you unhappy, so they can capitalise on it.

Jaguar Land Rover may be owned by Tata, an Indian financial holding company, but they’re still based in the UK, designed in the UK, built in the UK.

That was broadly the same for Mini too until the most recent generation, where the EV version is actually a Chinese car.

It’s nothing like that at all.

A keyboard is not a piano. Nobody can reasonably expect it to be a piano.

You’re talking about a very different situation to the one I am talking about. I never advocated for companies buying up exclusivity deals, particularly not when the development was done by publicly-owned institutions. I’m not sure where you got that from, because it sure as shit wasn’t from anything I wrote.

I agree it’s the world we should live in. But it’s not exactly realistic. And I’d rather discuss ways we can make our lives materially better as opposed to self-flagellation over a perfect solution while mocking anybody who proposes an imperfect but better-than-status-quo solution.

There is so many people letting perfect be the enemy of good on Lemmy.

Charge parents with neglect if they should have been expected to notice and respond to problems. That should be a jailable offense.

Great, send everyone to jail. Overcrowd prisons and put children into care. All because a parent let their child on social media…

I’m more saying the age limit is clumsy here

It isn’t. We have age limits for all kinds of things. How should this be any different?

Social media is completely different though, since parents are in direct control of the devices their kids have access to at home, and what’s available on their home network. Parents have the power to handle this themselves, so they should be expected to do so.

Parents can also control whether children buy alcohol, yet we still have restrictions on children.

I guess it would also signal to Lenovo that Fedora laptops are welcomed