This summer, a first-of-its-kind global research expedition followed up on that surprise. Drilling for fresh water under the salt water off Cape Cod, Expedition 501 extracted thousands of samples from what is now thought to be a massive, hidden aquifer stretching from New Jersey as far north as Maine.

It’s just one of many depositories of “secret fresh water” known to exist in shallow salt waters around the world that might some day be tapped to slake the planet’s intensifying thirst, said Brandon Dugan, the expedition’s co-chief scientist.

“We need to look for every possibility we have to find more water for society,” Dugan, a geophysicist and hydrologist at the Colorado School of Mines, told Associated Press journalists who recently spent 12 hours on the drilling platform. The research teams looked in “one of the last places you would probably look for fresh water on Earth.”

  • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Don’t worry, scientists. There’s a world that’s thirsty for you, just waiting to be tapped. Go forth, and research! It’s the end of the world, after all! Get in!

  • comador @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 day ago

    Good News: You’ve got a new source of fresh water.

    Bad News: Extraction will cause groundwater-related subsidence of the nearby shoreline, causing rapid erosion and lower elevations. Multiple shoreline properties may be lost.

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Multiple shoreline properties may be lost.

      Depending on the area, I don’t think I’m going to care much about some rich millionaires’ second homes being destroyed. Sure, I don’t want to see the erosion and decay of the landscape, but, you know…

      • FEIN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        thing is, if multiple shoreline properties may be lost, then owners of these properties may have something to say against extracting the water ¯\(ツ)

    • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m tired, boss. Grifters are wasting all our resources to prop up capitalism when all we need is a few well placed “Go get the fuck out of here”-s.

      • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Obscene amounts of resources and energy being burned up to give us Artificial general inteligence a really stupid chat bot that is constantly wrong.

        • ZMoney@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Artificial general intelligence built by people who don’t have any. Sounds great, give them half a trillion dollars!

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I don’t. I find the constant negativity quite draining, and I don’t want to spend too much time here as a result.

  • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Do these people not realize reverse osmosis has been a thing for decades; we don’t need to find new fresh water sources but actually stop polluting as that makes water purification more difficult and expensive

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        There are already lots of viable strategies for getting rid of brine, they are just more expensive than the naïve approach of having a big pipe on the shore spewing it into the ocean. Diluting it with seawater seems to be the most viable right now.

        I wonder if something like a 10 km underwater pipe with small holes in it that only let out a little bit of brine at a time would work. Might be a hassle to lay, at least to start, but I think that once it is in place it could operate without maintenance for decades. And piping is not really that expensive. Perhaps there are already researchers studying it, or it has been proven to not work. It seems like such an obvious idea.

        • Null User Object@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          There was an article the other day about a new plant in Japan that takes the brine from a reverse osmosis plant, and reverse osmosisizes [?] it again back into treated waste water to generate electricity. As I recall, it’s not full scale and meant more as a test/demo/proof of concept, but apparently it works ok for a first attempt.

    • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Keep in mind that current sewage treatment programs remove none of the medications and drugs we pee into our toilets > that end up in lakes and rivers > that end up in the ocean.

  • Talaraine@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Billions of dollars to get to it when they could install a desalination plant >.>

    Why are we like this?

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Because they’re academics and actual direct usefulness isn’t that important. A plausible-sounding story to get a grant is good enough. And then phys.org publishes it uncritically because they’re phys.org.

        • Deme@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The world doesn’t run on renewables. If the energy mix contains even a bit of fossil fuels, then any extra demand props up fossil energy that could be shut down.

          • nogooduser@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I’d also like to point out that when you say “the energy mix” you’re not meaning the energy mix used by this project.

            If any of our energy is from fossil fuels then increasing the use of energy increases the use of fossil fuels. Even if a new project uses 100% renewable energy it will increase the amount of fossil fuels used until we’ve eliminated them completely.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Cool. Come talk to me when finding water is hard, as opposed to just shipping a sufficient quantity to wherever you need it.

    If there’s a spot where a major center is next to one of these and nothing else, I suppose it could have a niche. I’m guessing the microbes and geological history are the main thing they’re excited about, though.