• Susurrus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    You could say smoking is one of the most human activities ever. Does nothing but actively harm and potentially kill everything around you. Just what we’re the best at.

    But seriously now. Can we speed up smoking bans? Like, everywhere?

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      But seriously now. Can we speed up smoking bans? Like, everywhere?

      Some European countries, including mine, has decided to raise the smoking age by 1 every year, essentially banning the next generation from smoking. Not really rapid or speeding up, but future is looking good

      There was a slight problem where some people were allowed to smoke for portion of the year after birthday and before the age increase, for every year

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        That I can’t get on board with personally. Everyone has a vice.

        Imagine doing that with cannabis or drinking. Probably wouldn’t get near the support even though those are also vices.

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Second hand drinking isn’t really a thing and I don’t see people smoking weed publicly all the time to the point it’s disgusting to eat at cafe, at least never noticed it, so most don’t really care.

          • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            It’s irrelevant. You’re telling people what they can and cannot do based on when they were born.

            It’d be one thing if no one could smoke. But youre not saying that. You’re strictly saying because you were born after x date that you can never smoke.

            That’s entirely messed up and my point being it’s terribly against personal freedom.

            And you basically proved my point- people will make allowances for other vices but not this.

            • REDACTED@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Note that I was telling what the government does, not what is my opinion on this.

              If I was steering the wheel, I’d just ban all drug consumption in public spaces, but allow non-destructive ones in personal spaces (your property), which includes tobacco and weed. I’d probably also limit the alcohol limit in drinks to something like 11%, so no absolut vodkas or smirnoffs as those tends to cause serious brain damage, which in return affects everyone around who have to deal with your vegetable state even when sober

              Disclaimer: I’m from east europe and alcohol consumption is kinda out of control for most people (yes, most people according to my experience)

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      all the more reason. what’s the point of banning something if no one’s doing it

    • Enoril@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      In cliché world yeah… But in reality, not so much. 😀

      It been years… no… decades that smoking have nearly disappeared around me - including in the office.

      I work with hundreds of people and the amount of people smoking can fit one hand. 25 years ago, i needed more than 2 hands to count them. And in my family, nobody starting at my parents generation and younger smokes.

      Same story with wine during lunch. 25 years ago, it was several bottles each day at lunches.

      Today, no more wine bottle and the trend started since easily 15 years now. Only for big occasion and the quantity have decreased a lot.

      People drink more beers now. But far less than wine.

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    I like these laws but also I want to smoke in some places. I’d love a return of places like cigar lounges and whisky bars

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    LOL like here in Montreal I see people smoking right next to the “No smoking within 3 meters” or whatever sign.

  • PattyP@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    This comment section is a disaster, just as bad as reddit. Comments of no substance on the side of popular opinion get upvotes, and waves of downvotes come for anyone who disagrees even a little, and even if they do it in a reasonable way.

    I’m mildly asthmatic so I don’t smoke, vape, etc. I have tried a few times and it is simply too much for my lungs to cope with. I still think banning people from smoking in public parks or on beaches is a bit much, and not doing the same with vaping seems like a strange double standard. I had a college roommate who both vaped and smoked, and the vaping bothered me more. I still put up with it.

    Hopefully enforcement is reasonable - respectful smokers who deliberately try to keep their distance should be allowed to enjoy themselves, but I understand prosecuting(?) those who show no care and smoke right next to nonsmokers.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      The issue with smoking is the second hand smoke. It causes cancer, among many other health issues. Vape on the other hand doesn’t really have this same concern.

      They aren’t banning smoking because of nicotine, they are banning it because it causes cancer.

      • PattyP@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Yes, secondhand smoke is bad. But we are talking about outdoor environments where it should usually be possible for smokers to keep their distance.

        As for vaping, it hasn’t really been around long enough yet to know for sure what the health risks are regarding the secondhand aerosol exposure, but there is reason to be concerned. It is almost certainly not as bad as secondhand smoke, but there are still risks.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          While I agree, these laws aren’t being made because smokers keep accidentally smoking near others, it’s because a large number of smokers can’t be assed to keep their distance. The major place I notice smokers is when they are just meandering through a large crowd as if everyone around them is fine with the smoke.

          • PattyP@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            I get that, but shouldn’t it be possible then to target that kind of behavior specifically rather than all smoking? Rather than banning smoking on x beach or in y park, they could ban smoking within x meters of a minor or non consenting adult. It would be more complicated but also more fair.

            Ultimately I don’t know what all of the problems with that approach would be, but it would make more sense to me.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Comments of no substance on the side of popular opinion get upvotes, and waves of downvotes come for anyone who disagrees even a little, and even if they do it in a reasonable way.

      Lemmy seems much worse for this than reddit TBH.

      There’s a number of topics about which any dissent is met with vehement derision. As in those engaging in wrong think are assholes.

      I don’t really know of course but I suspect it’s because lemmy has a narrower demographic than reddit. Opinions are just generally more homogeneous. I guess I’m describing an echo chamber.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      There’s one section of benches on my town common that smells like cigarettes from all the way over on the sidewalk. Even if it’s empty. There are so many smokers that the stink won’t go away even though it’s outside. Why do they get to ruin that section of park for everyone else?

      We have this one park with a small beach section. They try to rope off a s,all smoking section away from everyone else, but you can still smell it. Why do they get to ruin the public beach for everyone else?

    • Anonymaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      You just need to find the right community preferably where there are no bots, trolls

  • ihatefascist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    To protect children, meanwhile the soil is filled with cancer-inducing products pumped away illegally by big chemistry plants. In belgium and netherlands we can barely eat our own produce thanks to this. When are we gonna ban them??

  • Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    Dang, France is really about to take away the one thing that the USA has always been ahead of them on.

  • Zexks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    I love how everyone supporting this just assumes you’ll still be able to smoke at your own home when it doesn’t saying anything of the sort. It explicitly states ‘where children COULD be present’. This is literally everywhere short of some BDSM dungeon. This is basically going to make the population choose between smoking and having kids.

    • Kiliyukuxima@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      6 days ago

      Which actually sounds fair. Kids do not choose to be born and do not need to inhale smoke because parents are addicted to smoking

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is basically going to make the population choose between smoking and having kids.

      Hell I’d start smoking again.

    • Child_of_the_bukkake@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Yeah don’t smoke near your kids. It’s not that hard.

      They’re also making the population choose between drinking and driving.

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        No they’re not. Do they outlaw drinking everywhere children might one day walk through.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Do you often spill drinks into the mouths of passerby’s?

          The issue isn’t the substance, it’s the second hand smoke. Children are smart enough to know “this is a thing my parents do that I can’t” but no level of smart can keep the air they breath from containing smoke.

    • Zahtu@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well No, those laws usually only apply to Public areas, so as to Not Hurt your right of doing jackshit in your Home. At least the cannabis law in Germany has been designed Like it (but alas, cannabis is Not as much detrimental to the health of people around one as Smoking is).

  • Aggravationstation@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Whether its actually enforced or not will be the question. I went to Disneyland Paris 7 years ago, there were signs everywhere saying smoke only in designated areas but there were people smoking all over and none of the staff seemed to care.

  • Railison@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    The prolific smoking in France really hits home for me when I was subjected to a cloud of smoke on a train platform. I can’t remember the last time my personal space was so violated waiting for a train.

  • Horsey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I was in Paris just after the Olympics ended and I don’t think I smelled any tobacco at all. Marseille? Cigarettes everywhere. I couldn’t even enjoy eating at the cafés.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Reasoning aside, i agree that it shouldn’t be permitted outside one’s home

  • Goretantath@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    We’ve learned as a species that banning people from having bad things doesnt work since other bad people will make their own knockoffs and sell them, so we make using said bad things as PAINFULL as possible to protect everyone else. Win-win go fuck yourselves smoking retards.