In the US candidates do not technically need to be affiliated with any party nor even necessarily register with the government beforehand (it is almost Impossible to win without it for anything major), however for everything short of the president (electoral college makes weird) there is a blank spot where you can write a name and vote for that person. It appears to mostly be an American thing that has led to vermin supreme and other jokes.

Does Germany allow write in candidates?

local LLMs won’t necessarily force restrictions against de-realization spirals when the commercial ones do.

yet more arguments against commercial LLMs and in favour of at home uncensored LLMs.

at least the west is starting to acknowledge the torturous monotony of doing the same job for decades.

employ people that aren’t as bothered by it and pay them well. Presumably pedophiles would be more willing to moderate CSAM and people with psychopathy more willing to moderate torture and abuse. and as long as there is no paper trail of intentionally hiring these people I don’t know that it would be illegal.

more useful than most of what’s taught

I hate that at normal zoom it gives 3 and at 4 it gets slightly too small to read quickly.

I was thinking one of those bio powered military robots

the robot doesn’t need sleep, won’t get sick, and could (assuming they actually want to be competitive with human labor) require fewer safety precautions on the site (just make the entire area where the robots are as being hazardous and ensure that things won’t fall out of it) allowing for a roof to be constructed before the walls then building the walls underneath it.

the problem I have is that the law (609.772) appears to not only apply to political content, but all content that is

"so realistic that a reasonable person would believe it depicts speech or conduct of an individual who did not in fact engage in such speech or conduct; " and made without consent and wintin 90 days of political party conventions or after absentee voting starts.

By the way it is written the “presidents play Minecraft” series which most informed people would fully understand was not made my any presidents would likely fall under this law.

because one side is prioritizing democratic principles and the other is making an argument that could be related to the first amendment. Twitter absolutely isn’t doing this for any good reason, but the argument could be used for one.

is that actually usable (including app installs) for years without ever contacting a phone after initial setup?

asbestos at least was the best option until a couple years ago for numerous applications.

how many smartwatches existed that can be used without a phone?

because humans with resources (money) should be allowed to use it how they please, be it on tungsten cubes or pointless devices

because humans with resources (money) should be allowed to use it how they please, be it on tungsten cubes or pointless devices

and this is why humans are bad, a tool is neither good or bad, sure a tool can use a large amount of resources to develop only to be completely obsolete in a year but only humans (so far) have the ability (and stupidity) to be both in charge of millions of lives and trust a bunch of lithographed rocks to create tarrif rates for uninhabited islands (and the rest of the world).

it would almost certainly need to be done at a fast charger, not at home unless it could do only a few cells at a time. Remember the golden rule: “Don’t set the house on fire by overloading the wiring”.

doesn’t that game also have limping, a notoriously disability adjacent activity?