Following U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday, the Iranian Parliament has voted in support of closing the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical oil transit chokepoints, according to media reports.

Any final decision on retaliation, however, will rest with the country’s Supreme National Security Council and le

_

Around 20 percent of global oil trade passes through the Strait. Some experts have said that if Iran were to cut off access to the Strait, it could spike oil prices by 30 to 50 percent immediately, with gas prices likewise rising by as much as $5 per gallon.

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Good on them for being smart about this. Doesn’t always have to be bombs. I thought Trump was supposed to be a good business man.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Smart!? Can you not imagine what hell will drop on Iran if they go through with this? The world will not allow them to crash the global economy.

      This is simple posturing. Money says they don’t dare try this. They’re threatened before, never done it.

      • D_C@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I think it was 5 casinos and a casino holding company? Brb…

        Edit:
        Bankruptcies were…
        1991: Trump Taj Mahal
        1992: Trump Castle Hotel & Casino
        1992: Trump Plaza Casino
        1992: Trump Plaza Hotel (not a casino, just a hotel.)
        2004: Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts
        2009: Trump Entertainment Resorts. Which was a casino holding company. Not only did he bankrupt cannons he also bankrupted a company that syphons profits from casinos.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Is that smart? The US largest export is oil. Spiking the prices is what they want too.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s nearly impossible to block any given countries oil. Too lazy to write it all up, but ChatGPT gave me sane output on the question:

          You’re absolutely right — blocking a specific country’s oil exports or imports is extremely difficult in practice. There are several reasons for this:

          1. Global Oil Market is Highly Fungible

          Oil is a fungible commodity, meaning that once it’s extracted and enters the global supply chain, it’s often mixed, rebranded, or rerouted. That makes it very hard to trace its exact origin once it enters international trade.

          1. Third-Party Countries & Middlemen

          Countries can sell oil to intermediaries who then resell it under a different label or blend it with other sources. For example, sanctioned oil from Iran, Venezuela, or Russia has been known to enter markets through such indirect routes.

          1. Shipping and Flagging Loopholes

          Oil can be transferred ship-to-ship in international waters (a tactic known as “dark fleet” operations), often with falsified paperwork, GPS manipulation, or using flags of convenience to hide the oil’s origin. 4. Global Demand

          Many countries, especially in the Global South, will continue buying oil wherever they can get it, especially at discounted rates. This demand gives sanctioned countries alternative markets.

          1. Limited Enforcement Capacity

          International bodies like the UN or even the U.S. and EU can impose sanctions, but enforcement — especially on the high seas — is expensive, politically sensitive, and technically challenging.

          1. Economic Blowback

          Broad oil bans can also harm the economies of sanctioning countries by raising global prices, fueling inflation, or creating supply disruptions — making governments hesitant to implement strict bans.

          Bottom line: Even with sanctions or embargoes, oil tends to find a way into the global market. Cutting off a specific country’s oil completely would require not only international political unity but also technological and logistical enforcement capabilities that currently don’t exist at the necessary scale.

        • overthere@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It’s not the good of the people that they’re thinking of. The US people are just another market to be exploited. Imagine the profits that the producers can harvest