WAR CRIMES

Agreed. This article sounds like the kind of BS corporate media’s trying to parrot to gaslight us into giving up WFH.

Good. WotC is wretched hive of scum and villainy.

This childless man loves his peace, quiet, and alone time.

But maybe I don’t qualify as I have dogs, friends, and kickass neighbors.

That’s the deadline Donald set for the passage of the Big Beautiful Bill as well.

Oh did they cooperate?

Yes.

Why was there detection of weapon-able uranium then?

I think we’ve already discussed this on the thread: US / Israeli aggression, both diplomatic and non-diplomatic. You are aware that the US withdrew from the former nuclear agreement, right? Donald prioritizes looking like a tough guy over successful diplomatic relations, at least against countries that can’t fight back.

Was that just an accident while trying to use nuclear power for good?

Originally, yes. Now? They’re developing nukes by necessity, or are you not aware that Israel just attacked them?

Also teachers should have access to nukes so they can deter potential school shooters. And i need some nukes as well to defend my home /s

Logical fallacies don’t lend credence to your argument. (Or your intellect.)

So maybe if Iran didnt try to develop a-bombs then Israel would have no reason to attack.

You’re ignoring the most important detail. They did so while cooperating within the international community. That is, until the US decided to support, supply, and fund a war against them, thus making the development of nukes essential to their survival. (After ordering assassinations of their leaders and violating our own agreements with them.)

Israeli aggression, and I wish someone would slip one or two nukes to Palestine as well.

The US has nothing to do with these news

That’s just not true. It’s our weapons being shot into Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran. We have everything to do with this because it’s impossible for these escalations to occur without US weapons shipments.

Surely these people should.never have nukes.

The same people who waited until they were attacked before fighting back? The same so-called extremists who, for decades, have worked within the international community to develop their nuclear program? (Before Donald decided to fund and arm an Israeli war against them, and this was after ordering assassinations of their leaders in his last admin.)

I think that you’re listening to some very biased newscasts in constructing this opinion.

It’s always interesting to me when people unironically downplay the destruction the US government causes and has caused on a planetary, not even local scale.

if anything nobody should have any nukes

Agreed, but that’s not the world we live in. And it is the extremist governments that have nukes. That’s partly how the US gets away with making war in seven countries at once. (That we know of.)

I strongly doubt that. The thought of a nuke being deployed on Jerusalem would give even the craziest Israeli pause.

I hope they do manage to develop a nuke.

That’s the only thing that’s going to stop this war, the worry about mutually-assured destruction.

I hate that all of the worst things Donald is planning are slated for July 4.

He also chucks down Big Macs like no one’s business.

Here’s what Donald farted into the wind on his media platform: “Many calls and meetings now taking place. I do a lot, and never get credit for anything, but that’s OK, the PEOPLE understand.”

It infuriates me that Israel attacked Iran first and they’re still messaging this as ‘premeditated murder’ on the part of the Iranians.

You are objectively wrong.

They have solved homelessness, minus approximately 1,000 willfully homeless people. (Though I like to think of them as Nomads.)

Fair points.

I’m not saying you’re wrong, just that unemployment means something very different in more extreme capitalist countries. :)

Oof.

Doesn’t Finland have UBI though? They’ve also basically solved homelessness.