You’ve been denying every bit of that and been explicitly pro-israel to the point of deleting pro Palestinian comments over non-existent rules violations over in the news community.

I remember you defending the Sde Teiman torture-rape camp when the videos first came to light.

I find it impossible to believe someone, let alone a biased moderator of News, that defended Sde Teiman would find anything disturbing.

P.S. tags are fun.

A statement that makes it clear you haven’t paid attention go Libya since NATO destroyed it.

They’ve shot down twenty. Not just one.

Maybe they’ll do a better job than NATO.

Can’t get much worse.

Germanies legal definition of antisemitism includes criticism of Israel.

Just because you aren’t doesn’t mean others are as apathetic to genocide committed in their name.

Secondly, Zionism is an inherently colonial apartheid project. The methods are required for the end goal. People don’t want to leave their homeland and give up all their shit. If you want them too, which is ideologically required for Zionism, then those are the methods you’re going to use.

The problem isn’t the bombs and guns, it’s the colonialism and apartheid. The methods are fixed when those are the goals.

I’m enjoying how the obvious rebuttal to this stupid propaganda talking point is now so widespread I don’t have to say it anymore.

Bibi has been the head of the government in Israel for twenty something years and ran a pretty rightwing and harsh genocidal apartheid regime.

You don’t beat them by being them.

You also don’t win by lying about Obama assassinating American Citizens intentionally.

https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/world/middleeast/07yemen.html?hp

But, by all means, please continue lying.

You may be mistaking him for one of his children whom we’ve also killed.

It absolutely was targeted.

Why are you saying it wasn’t?

They’re attempting to justify the unjustifiable.

They’re polite and calm about it, you’re correct. But those words pertain to how information is transmitted, not something that can be used to consider the morality of the information contained therein.

Do not confuse a kind way of saying horrible things as making the horrible things not horrible.

You’re more respectful then the person you are responding to deserves.

Biden tried and failed to secure cooperation from Sisi to ethnically cleanse them to the Sinai desert and failed.

The administrations are obviously different. This is not an example of that.

VOA is explicitly American propaganda. That is literally its public purpose and goal.

His domestic opposition is more vocally pro-war then he is, so no, this wouldn’t end it.

It already has?

Every nation in this world would consider this to be material support of an enemy.

I mean shit, we were debanking people named Isis.

Shouldn’t the headline be ‘Israel violates ceasefire terms by keeping troops in southern Lebanon locations’?

Biden didn’t state anything. That was his thing. Not giving interviews. With his administration it wasn’t what he said, it’s what his administration did.

And yes, Anthony Blinken flew all over the middle east trying to get this proposal through. I’m sorry you like to post opinions on something you apparently have no knowledge of.

https://newlinesmag.com/reportage/middle-east-reels-a-new-option-takes-shape-expulsion/

XMPP is SOOO much easier to admin.

I don’t think you recognize how bad it was under Biden then.