Shira Anderson, an American international rights lawyer, is Meta’s AI policy chief who voluntarily enlisted for the IDF in 2009 under a program which enables non-Israeli Jews who aren’t eligible for military conscription to join the Israeli army.

With AI a critical emerging technology for tech giants and militaries, Anderson’s role at Meta is an important one. She develops the legal guidance, policies and public relations talking points concerning AI issues and regulation for all of Meta’s key areas, including its product, public policy and government affairs teams.

At Meta, Anderson, who is based in Meta’s Washington DC office, is in familiar company. More than one hundred former Israeli spies and IDF soldiers are employed by the company, my new investigation shows, many of whom worked for Israel’s spy agency Unit 8200.

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    11 days ago

    Yes all occupiers are valid military targets but keep in mind that

    Meta’s AI policy chief who voluntarily enlisted for the IDF in 2009 under a program which enables non-Israeli Jews who aren’t eligible for military conscription to join the Israeli army.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 days ago

        That is what mandatory conscription leads to. All Israelis except for the very few who refuse service are trained soldiers with direct ties to the army. All those reservists are now participating in the genocide.

    • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      You understand that you’re effectively arguing for targeting Israeli civilians with violence and advocating for genocide. You’re explicitly endorsing terrorism

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        You’re explicitly endorsing terrorism

        I am not endorsing Israel nor violence against civilians. I am endorsing the right of Palestinian armed resistance against occupation soldiers

            • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              10 days ago

              Active duty IDF soldiers? Or former IDF soldiers; because you’re trying to “out” former military Israeli civilians who happen to work for facebook.

              Do you believe that it is right to target any former member of the Israeli military, who is now a civilian, with violence?

              • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                19
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                10 days ago

                The term reservist means the Israeli army can actively summon them for combat. As Israel has done for the genocide in Gaza.

                Unless these soldiers decide to leave occupied Palestine they are not ex-soldiers because they are actively occupying and can be summoned for combat.

                If you are talking about the ex-IDF soldiers at Facebook, they are not valid military targets if they are not occupying Palestine. Though they should face a court of law if they are using their position for Israel.

                • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  Attacking reservists who are not activated violates the Geneva Convention and is nearly universally considered - including by Palestine, which has signed the Geneva Convention - to be a war crime.

                  This includes civilians - which deactivated reservists are - in occupied areas.

                  Ukraine is similarly not allowed to attack occupying Russians in Crimea who moved there after 2014, despite the fact all male Russians had military service.

                  Israel uses the exact same argumentation to kill “combat-aged” men - that is to say, male Palestinians who look 14 or older.

                  Also, being an occupying civilian during a conflict does not allow an opposing party to arrest them. They are afforded various protections, especially by the 4th Geneva Comvention.

                  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 days ago

                    You should look up why the UN does not classify Hamas as a terrorist organisation and educate yourself on the right of armed resistance for people under occupation.

                    What Israel says is irrelevant. They are the occupier and have no right to anything except moving out of Palestine as soon as possible.