In last year’s survey, 66% of developers reported working on games for PC, while this year’s number is significantly higher at 80%. In comparison, 38% of developers said they were working to put their game on PlayStation while 34% said they were developing for Xbox.

Now, GDC clarifies that “Steam Deck” was not specifically listed as a platform option in the survey. However, when answering which platforms they were developing for, 44% of respondents who chose “Other” did mention “the Steam Deck as a platform they’re interested in,” which potentially shows a significant focus on Valve’s handheld.

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    20 hours ago

    the steam deck sits in a pretty decent position long term because the switch 2 has roughly similar performance levels as it. so developers would have double the reason to get a game working at said performance level.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 hours ago

      They’ll also have potentially more exposure, as many other companies have and will be coming out with SteamOS handhelds of their own. So if anyone had to choose, it might make more sense to skip the Switch 2.

      • evujumenuk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Nintendo has moved over 140 million Switch consoles. The Switch 2 might become more, or less successful, but let’s just conservatively assume they’ll only sell half as many this time around.

        Last time I checked, the entire Deck-like category amounted to some seven-digit number of sold devices. The idea that anyone targeting that level of performance is going to skip the Switch 2… is wildly unrealistic.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I mean, I know what you’re saying. Nintendo is no slouch when it comes to drawing people in, but they’re no longer the only fish in the pond. Couple that with the general customer satisfaction with Deck-likes and the flat deluge of games to which you have access, and there’s a real chance of people at least thinking twice before jumping on a Switch 2.

          Some people won’t care, but Nintendo is going to have to really work to pull others away from all those extras you get by design. Plus, that’s not even getting into how stupidly easy it is to set up emulation, which you have to pay a lot for via Nintendo.

          • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Even a Wii U-level failure would vastly outsell the Deck.

            I get what you’re saying, but there’s just no way on planet earth that the market will ignore the Switch 2 in favour of the Deck 2.

            Plenty will, I’m sure. But mostly PC gamer types.

            I think if you’re expecting the SD2 to sell anywhere near the Switch 2 you’re setting yourself up for disappointment.

            • Telorand@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I’m not. I’m more hoping for Nintendo to get a wakeup call that improving customer satisfaction and giving them actual value, rather than clawing and squeezing and litigating every dollar possible from their freaking fans, is actually a viable business strategy.

    • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Also dedicated gpus are getting expensive and I think PC gamers are going to need to game on integrated gpus as Ai will use all the dedicated ones.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      . so developers would have double the reason to get a game working at said performance level.

      I don’t think this point has merit since deck is x86 and switch is arm?

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Graphics are graphics, that’s what limits most of the games and devices. Optimize something to run on the Switch 2, and that should work on the Deck too.
        That benchmark used to be the PS4, but most developers have dropped support for last gen hardware.

    • Hiro8811@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I haven’t used either switch but compared to the steam deck smoothness and versatility the software can’t be that good

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I think if/when valve release the SD2, development will pick up even more. And now Lenovo is in the game. I think we are good, folks.

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    How many of them are indie developers and how many do AAA? (Edit: The article says “Something to remember here is that the majority of devs are indie developers rather than larger AAA studios.”) I think one of the biggest contributors to this is that supporting Steam Deck is much easier thanks to Proton, especially if they already have a Windows version. And the extra exposure they get through the Steam store and various articles and forums by having a Steam Deck version.