• Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 days ago

    You know what the richest ore for finding metals for new batteries is? Old batteries. Same applies to solar panels. This is great to see.

      • nightlily@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yeah it takes insane amounts of electricity. There’s an aluminium smelter in NZ with an entire hydroelectric power plant dedicated to it. 13% of the total electricity supply of NZ dedicated to just one smelter.

    • Geobloke@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I believe 10% of a lithium battery is lithium. I mean, it’s impressive and I love a closed loop for the life of any component, but this doesn’t really solve our need for more lithium. Reduce it yes, but not end the requirement for more extraction

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        Any metal in a car needs mining and extraction.

        You would not believe how inefficient mining is for platinum and rhodium in ICE catalytic convertors. The oil and gas industry has really drilled into the heads of people that lithium is evil.

  • tgf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    “The process starts with old batteries being separated and burned to strip away non-metal components. What’s left gets crushed into something called black mass. This is essentially a powder packed with recoverable metals. From there, a water-based chemical treatment called hydrometallurgy pulls the lithium out. One clever distinction in this new process is that the recovered lithium hydroxide actually replaces a chemical traditionally used during refining. This cuts the carbon footprint by about 40% compared to older methods.”

    Article also said that previous methods got about 45% of the lithium from recycling.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Around the time that MH370 was missing and I was still on Twitter. Clarkson posted a picture from his plane showing oxygen masks down and saying something like i hope we don’t die or something.

      I called him out for being insensitive due tonMH370. He replied saying something like I’m on a plane dummy how am I supposed to know.

      That was then the catalyst for me receiving thousands of inboxes and DMs from his stans calling me an idiot for daring to call out JC.

      I’ve never liked him since then. Then he punched someone on Top Gear and got fired. Now he’s a moaning farmer, right wing, alcoholic.

  • northendtrooper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Ok it needs to be said. The smart play is to have governments to subsidize this process and build up the raw inventory for lithium. That way, ie (US) could have tons and tons of raw lithium without having to mine it.

      • FederatedFreedom1981@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Why not both? Downcycle the old EV batteries for grid storage, then when they reach the end of useful life, recycle them. We need to resurrect the first 2 R’s (Reduce, Reuse) to be able to survive on this planet.

        • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          They are listed in order of importance… reduce first, if you can’t, then reuse. If you can’t reuse, then recycle.

          Problem is, we saw “recycle” and thougt “infinite resources” and ditched the other two… turns out that most things cant really be recycled, so now it’s just landfill all the way

          • FederatedFreedom1981@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            I wish I could remember where I read it, but the focus on just Recycle was encouraged as the main narrative by corporations which didn’t want to give up the myth of endless growth.

    • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      That’s great and all, but not all batteries need lithium. When another battery technology gets mature enough to surpass lithium based batteries, then we’ll still be stuck on old tech cause the government is subsiding it.

      This also reduces the incentive for making more lithium efficient batteries.

      Subsidies can help, but they need to be more generalized so they don’t create issues moving past current tech. Heck, look at how much trouble we’re having getting past oil, that’s a perfect example.

      • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Under modern physics, Lithium is pretty much the best possible chemical to build batteries out of. Anything else that might be better won’t be a chemical battery, and it’s not like there’s any reason to suspect some new magic thing will be created like a pocket-size fusion reactor that will make chemical batteries totally obsolete any time soon. Decades more of lithium batteries being relevant are as close to guaranteed as can be.

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            Those are not “better” batteries chemically or electrically. They are just cheaper and don’t use lithium which is considered a feature.

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              Sodium batteries are cheaper, safer, and last longer than lithium batteries. That’s exactly what you want for grid-scale energy storage. So yes, sodium IS better than lithium for grid-scale energy storage

                • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  And you can even mix-and-match cells of both types in a vehicle to better fit a target demographic. It’s not simply one or the other.

                  That being said, it’s better to have a car with a 200 mile range sodium battery and a small range extender for that 2-4 times per year trip

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Lithium recycling has never been the problem. The problem is most EVs are new, and people aren’t buying enough of them, so there isn’t enough capacity of old batteries in the system yet for business to profit from building the plants to do the recycling. And now some stupid orange asshole has been sabotaging production, so we’re not going to hit that tipping point for decades.

    • sonofearth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      I just want the fucking oil mafia to burn at sun’s temperature. They are such a fucking obstacle and disgrace to humanity’s development. Same goes for the big pharma. All the suffering just because of greed for a piece of paper with £/₹/$/€ on it.

      Ok angry rant over.

      • foggianism@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        Capitalism rewards profit. Imagine basing all aspects of life on profit making. Of course human needs, interests, environment health etc. take up a side-role in such a system.