• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Unrelated but how do people feel about the ai images when used for something like this.

    The font is very telling for being DallE

    • NightFantom@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think it strongly detracts from the post. I basically skipped right to the comments without clicking the link because I’m assuming it’s AI slop, and I’m hoping the comments are interesting.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        AI should be able to do a really good systemd debate by now, the available training material is immensely huge.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      People would be less mad if you straight up used a stock image with a watermark so I don’t understand why people go out of their way to use AI when they know people will comment on it and it will detract from the point of the article.

      Also, using AI in the thumbnail makes people automatically assume you’re using AI in the text as well. And if you’re not doing that, why would you lessen the perceived value of your writing by making it seem like you are?

      It just seems pointless and actively harms your actual goals because people will get hung up on the fact that you used AI and ignore your actual valid points. Especially when you’re writing about open source projects when most people interested in open source are vehemently anti-AI, it really just shows you don’t know your target audience.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/systemd/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus systemd Linux.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’d say the main bad part of systemd is how it’s used and now expected everywhere.

    If you search for some Linux guides or install something complicated or whatnot, they always expect you to have systemd. Otherwise, you’re on your own figuring how things work on your system.

    This shouldn’t really happen. Otherwise, yes, it’s great, it integrates neatly, and is least pain to use.

    • Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      In my opnion, systemd is like core-utils at this point.

      It’s so integrated into most things and the default so many places, that most guides assume you have it.

    • whaleross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      There is no authority delegating responsibilities of writing tutorials for Linux. It is the responsibility of nobody and everybody. If you can’t find one for your problem, write it yourself when you have figured it out.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sure, but I can’t single-handedly create an entire knowledge base on doing everything with X, so it’s a real and big limitation.

        • whaleross@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If you think so and that this is important, maybe you could be the one that makes it happen. Start a project and gather like-minded people. That is how Linux, FOSS and community driven efforts operate. It’s useless to complain that nobody else makes the effort if you have the capabilities but can’t be arsed making an attempt yourself.

  • darthinvidious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t appreciate the attitude and arrogance of the guy behind systemd because he actually believes what he produces can replace everything that already “just works”. He wants to push out systemd-homed because “why not”. He wants to replace grub. He wants to replace a myriad of things that just flat out don’t need to get replaced. autofs, cron, you name it! That kind of thinking and one-size-fits-all mentality is backwards and does not benefit the community in any way. All it does is stuff everything into one bin and so long as influencers like this guy continue to restrict what works or doesn’t work according to their own work, the community and its users will not be able to freely develop FOSS. Gnome is a good example of something that creates too much of a dependency on systemd and so when you’re trying to use something like Gentoo, it becomes very difficult to get that done and hacks have to made in order to get it working. FOSS shouldn’t work like that. He’ll keep stripping away legit projects from major distros until IBM/Red Hat finally decide to seal the deal and lock everyone out for good. Sorry if I can’t rejoice in the woah whiplash.

    • Magiilaro@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      All it does is stuff everything into one bin

      Well, it is not one bin. There is no monolithic systemd bin that does everything. There are a lot of separate bin files for all the different tasks. Well and if you don’t want to use timers, then don’t and just use cron instead. If you don’t want to use journald, then just don’t and use rsyslog or whatever you want. Don’t need systemd-homed? Well, then don’t use it. You want to configure your network with something else then systemd-networkd? Great, do it if you want.

      The Poettering Army will not come and force you to enable all the options 😜

      • vivendi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Except, they are. Pottering is the front man who does the dirty work for IBM and Microsoft to take over Linux by forcing distros to adopt systemd.

        Those of us old enough to remember the “vote” that resulted in Debian going to Systemd remember it was almost at gunpoint.

        Death to systemd, long live FOSS culture

    • urandom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The is the first time I’ve ever heard someone accusing grub of „just working“

      • Magiilaro@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Grub is working perfectly fine.

        If it breaks it is, in my experience as a grub user for over 20 years and as a guy working in server hosting for 15 years, either because of failing HDD/SSD or because of user error. People don’t read when the updater tells them that running “grub-install” is needed (or they perform it on the wrong drive/partition) and then blame grub when it fails on the next boot.

        The crappy bootloader that comes with systemd very often, in my experience, fails to register that a new Kernel was installed and boots the old one (or fails to boot if the package manager removed the old Kernel).

        Oh and GRUB has so many useful features, like booting a ISO image. GRUB is a piece of programmer art!

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I totally agree. I used to hate systemd for breaking the traditional Unix philosophy, but the reality is that a tight init and service-tracking integration tool really was required. I work with and appreciate systemd every day now. It certainly didn’t make things simplier and easier to debug, but it goes a long way towards making a Linux system predictable and consistent.

    Poettering can go fuck himself though - and for PulseAudio too. I suspect half of the hate systemd attracted over the years was really because of this idiot.