• theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thanks, I literally just looked this up and saw that is supposedly the case. That’s very surprising to me. At least it has that

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Microsoft seems to be throwing in the towel as far as driving people to their storefront is concerned. They’ll be putting out all their games on anything that can run them.

        • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’d argue this is not really the case, and their strategy has shifted to increasing the price of actually “owning” games to be a premium experience, ie all their new games are now $80, making subscription prices seem more attractive

          • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            They walked back the $80 price point, but I definitely agree they’re trying to figure out ways to push people to gamepass. They just keep stepping on rakes

          • Aielman15@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            They rolled back the $80 increase when they noticed that people weren’t going to buy Outer Worlds 2 at that price point. They then confirmed that their games will stay at $70 for the foreseeable future (ie. until a bigger player normalized $80 games).