• jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I don’t hate AI, and I think broadly hating AI is pretty dumb. It’s a tool that can be used for beneficial things when used responsibly. It can also be used stupidly and for bad things. It’s the person using it who is the decider.

    • ysjet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The problem is that there’s basically no way to use it responsibly.

      • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It helped me rewrite a program with different criteria, and it was much faster. I also read everything it wrote and told it what corrections to make. It is good for speed. It also taught me a coding trick or two. It is definitely not reliable, but can help a bit.

      • elucubra@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I think there is. Letting the actual professionals guide, instead of the money people is a big step.

        Something like McDonnell, and later Boeing, basing all decisions on economic short gains, instead of engineering criteria.

        Bean counters shouldn’t make decisions.

        • ysjet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          The problem is, who do you define as professionals? I’m a professional software engineer. I argue that there is no responsible way to use AI at the moment- it uses too many resources for a far too worthless result. Everything useful that an AI can do is currently better (and cheaper) to do another way, save perhaps live transcription.

          Do you define Sam Altman as a professional? Because his guidance wants the entire world to give up 10% of the worldwide GDP to his company (yes, seriously!) He’s clearly touched in the head, or on drugs. Should we follow his advice?

    • AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I’ve definitely been pretty anti-AI, finding it kinda stupid and generally useless…

      …but we hired an AI researcher at my work (which I laughed at). But I cannot deny anymore that with the proper setups, configs, rules, blend of onsite / cloud resources etc. - workplace AI can be pretty fucking game changing. To the point where I went from campaigning against the changes because I felt they were a waste of time to where I am worried for my future job and am using agents 5-10 times a day to handle small bugfixes for me.

      I don’t know what will happen when the bubble pops though.

      • jaykrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The bubble is irrelevant, that’s just capitalism being inefficient. When the dot com bubble popped it’s not like the internet died. We got things like Netflix and Amazon only after the bubble popped.