Not necessarily. It does prove that it legally should be optional.

The fact that there was a high profile case might indicate that it’s not as trivially optional as you make it seem.

No one is happy with the current circumstances. You’re blaming the victim though, and not the aggressor. Please share how you think this war should be resolved.

Not much of an answer to my question, but I was more curious of bobr’s response anyway.

What is your suggestion to stop the war?