Two things can be bad at once. The US can be an imperialist POS and Iran can be a fundamentalist, autocratic theocracy.

The people in Iran have every reason and right to resist and revolt, just as we should be doing here.

Including Iran is crazy

You can buy second hand! Backmarket, Ebay, Facebook Marketplace, Craigslist.

Fascism. The only thing that matters is power and deception.

Nope… This is a person actively choosing comfort over morals and over actual safety.

GrapheneOS, LineageOS, CalyxOS,…

It’s still Android, but it’s built off the open source base of Android.

Eating parts of kids? Raping infants? Getting pegged by young boy? Sasha said in an unconfirmed testimony that he and other children had to anally fuck and penetrate men with dildos and other objects. The men would lay on their back with their legs spread and get pegged.

Nothing will. They’re moving us onto techno feudalism. We won’t earn anything and we’ll be wage slaves if they’re merciful to us, otherwise most people will be in camps and dead, unless we stand up real damn soon .

They’re actively moving away from the bottom 90% of consumers, it’s just not worth it anymore and maybe once it was worth advertising to us, but no longer. The top 10% owns 93% of stocks and control at least 55% of the market revenue as of early 2025, probably closer to 60-65% now, after tariffs, layoffs, and the nonexistent recession We’re all imagining and definitely isn’t real. /s

Do we do cake day comments on lemmy? Whatever. Happy cake day!

I always have my “smart” TV disconnected from internet, and I run my media viewing through the steam deck in desktop mode, but any Linux computer will work just as fine. Then I employ some high sea villainy and boom, set to coast.

Oh I absolutely agree. LLMs are not going to achieve AGI, not even close. I don’t think this AI will replace us, but the ruling class want it to so badly. And they’re looking for ways to develop AGI as quickly as possible or something like it. Still, in the background of all the chatbot noise has been real development on drone ai technology, mechanical robot advancements, and other machine learning.

The reason the wealthy are fine basically burning money to continue developing any form of AI is that they are so excited and ready to hunt us for sport. These people HATE us for just existing in their presence and on “their” world. They don’t care that OpenAI is a money furnace, it has already allowed them to get many of us hooked on AI psychosis, poison internet discourse with propaganda and disinformation, and steal trillions of creative works to hoard and eventually control all information. I think some of them are dumb enough to believe the bs about llms becoming advanced ai ready to replace all of us. But even if not, they still have gained so much out of it.

Still, don’t let yourself believe they’re not working on every possible means to develop ASI/AGI. The fact that we even still have a say over labor and can threaten that against them, is anathema to them. We should be slaves or dead. And we are running out of time to use that labor bargaining chip, after that is gone, only manpower and physical numbers are left, and they control all the militaries and firepower…

Top 10% owns 93% of stocks and accounted for 55% of market activity in early 2025, before tariffs and mass layoffs and an unnamed recession. They’re probably at 60 -65% of revenue now. You’re absolutely right. The rich have been working to remove us from the equation for decades. In our buying power, and in our labor power with AI.

I am so glad to see someone else talking about this. Yeah, We’re going back to feudalism… And only the upper ranks of society will be able to afford goods and be able to engage in trade.

*skynet

EV6 gang??

500 years more so

How does a system that requires a stateless society appeal to hierarchists like tankies?

Servo browser is the other big from the ground browser project. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servo_(software)

No. That logical fallacy is completely misunderstood and posted everywhere. It only occurs when you continue to shift the goalposts. If someone makes a claim and defends it continuously, then the fallacy does not occur.

“No true Scotsman or appeal to purity is an informal fallacy in which one modifies a prior claim in response to a counterexample by asserting the counterexample is excluded by definition.[1][2][3] Rather than admitting error or providing evidence to disprove the counterexample, the original claim is changed by using a non-substantive modifier such as “true”, “pure”, “genuine”, “authentic”, “real”, or other similar terms.[4][2]”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

Shut down discourse! That’ll show them!