JojoWakaki

I honestly preferred no sequls, everytime something new. I haven’t played pyre and hades 2. While I liked hades, I was a bit sad when I heard hades 2, instead of something new.

I’m not an expert, but money (sales) is probably the reason. How many of their previous games sold vs Hades.

Also, maybe it’s a bit cynnical to think of it this way, but hades 2 would require much less effort compared to making something new and it will churn sales as the first one has been a success. Additionally, they probably already had good idea and materials for additions to hades. So why not make hades 2 out of them. Maybe after that they will work on something new.

I would Emacs, but my pinky can’t.

The things I would be ok paying a subscription for:

• Rotating free Games that I get to keep. Like epic but only for subscribers. The game should be mine even after I quit the subscription.
• Extra insights in preservation, or goodies
• voting rights on what games should be free next month for the sunscribers.
• discounted price on games.

Things that I feel it shouldnot be locked behind subscription and paywall:

• tool for backing up offline installers
• ability to install previous versions of game
• and definitely not voting rights on games to bring into the preservation program.

If the tooks for backing up offline installers or ability to install previous versions of game are paywalled, that is going to invite more reasons for piracy.