

If you have a very sensitive threat model, it can also limit charging to only when the device is off. Which is the most secure form of charging
If you have a very sensitive threat model, it can also limit charging to only when the device is off. Which is the most secure form of charging
Because censorship of topical newsworthy events is antithetical to freedom. Sure first the censorship will start with “gruesome” but it won’t stop there, let people opt out, but it shouldn’t be scrubbed from existence.
We’ve moved all of your data into OneDrive for your convenience, however you have exceeded your free OneDrive storage limit, please submit a payment immediately or the data will be deleted
Any system is imperfect, that means some people in prison must be innocent, that means crimes are being inflicted against innocent people.
Before we try to manage the entire population at large, let’s just eliminate crime in prisons and jails. That’s a controlled environment, but it’s rife with crime. If we can’t fix a controlled environment, how can we possibly fix an open environment?
Using the drones for a led based video display just makes sense but I was still surprised when they did it.
I wonder how they plan out the movements?
They only have to pass it once, so it’s just a long game waiting for the resistance to slack a bit
DietDoctor is a group of doctors focused on metabolic health, it does not have a relationship with Feldman. https://www.dietdoctor.com/about/team-diet-doctor
David Feldman has never called himself a doctor
Yes, people with agendas fund science, the results speak for themselves, that is the purpose of science - publish reproducible results for others to replicate.
he funded the study, organized it, sourced the volunteers, etc.
The paper hasn’t been updated, the cleerly AI is part of the original paper.
The updated model data is presented in a preliminary form in the lecture, papers still pending.
Right, so the paper using the cleerly model only showed one person reversing plaque, but the two new ai models which don’t have a artificial floor, do show 30% plaque reversal. That’s the second reference to the YouTube talk.
The interesting thing here, is this group of 100 people following a strict ketogenic diet, mostly carnivore, had imaging done at the beginning and the end of a year. So we can apply any models to it that we like, it’s interesting that in 2/3 of the AI imaging models they show 30% of the people with plaque regression
The benefit of AI here is it makes it a quantitative analysis, assuming the AI model is stable. When we involve the humans to do scoring, there’s always a question about consistency, and bias in the outcomes.
As far as I’m aware plaque regression is basically unheard of at all in any literature outside of case studies
Thank you! Identifying sockpuppet accounts took some doing, but it has been really a fun adventure. Here is my moderation policy if you want the details https://hackertalks.com/post/13655318
Thank you for your organic downvotes!
Actually its 30 sockpuppet identifications so far.
The original study: [Paper] - Plaque Begets Plaque, ApoB Does Not: Longitudinal Data From the KETO-CTA Trial - 2025
The update with new AI imaging: New KETO-CTA Data - Clarification and Update on Cleerly
These didn’t really get downvoted because the trigger words were avoided, and the communities are actively pruned of disinterested people, if you are looking for downvote brigading I could dig up examples for you
Yeah, lemmy can be very emotional!
Trying to keep a community on topic without that level of gut reaction is a sisyphean task https://discuss.online/modlog/696952?page=1&actionType=ModBanFromCommunity but i try anyway
Ohhh, this 100%
I just posted a plaque imaging study using AI analysis showing people eating the carnivore diet reversing plaque buildup by doing over a year of a strict ketogenic diet.
People I could have offended
But instead I used a name without any of the trigger words and they missed it
We could rewrite this headline as:
Advanced identification techniques let doctors diagnose cancer earlier saving lives!
The only reason we are here is you have asserted Monero is a scam, we have since agreed that Monero does not have a known leak, so I’m no longer concerned about the “scam” aspect as far as leaks go and have no further interest in this discussion with you.
Please make a ask post in !monero@monero.town for the details
You have demonstrated yourself to not be a good faith conversationalist, and I don’t have the energy to engage with you at scale. However, I have faith the good people of lemmy will pitch in, especially the XMR community.
The only reason we are here is you have asserted Monero is a scam, we have since agreed that Monero does not have a known leak, so I’m no longer concerned about the “scam” aspect as far as leaks go and have no further interest in this discussion with you.
Hey, you already took a bite at this apple! now you want to do it again? Why not just update your other post.
There is very little overlap between respected cryptography researchers and bitcoin developers.
Ok, and what does that have to do with Monero? Monero IS NOT BITCOIN
I don’t know a deanonymization attack on Monero.
Thank you for EXPLICTLY stating that. That is the only reason why half the people in this thread are responding you to. We don’t care if you like Monero, we just care if you knew about an attack that we didn’t know about.
Even if there was no currently known deanonymization attack, that would not mean that a deanonymization attack is impossible for everyone and for all time.
Hey! We finally agree on something. This goes into your threat model and use. Most people wont care if their remittances can be cracked 5-10 years into the future. If someone had a very sensitive threat model, they would have to be far more careful.
Oh, I’m sorry if I was confusing in my writing, I’ll be clear:
Monero is the optimal choice for wire transfers because it maximizes privacy, prevents third parties from committing human rights violations, stops rent seeking, and gives financial autonomy to the downtrodden. It is the refuge of last resort in conflicts, humanitarian crisis, and the debanked.
Access to the money you earned is a human right.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/implicit
Contained in the essential nature of something but not openly shown.
Just to clear that up for you.
Yep. I carry around a USB data protector in my bag at all times. They’re tiny, by 20. Put them around You’re going to lose them. They’re great.