• 0 Posts
  • 77 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 19th, 2024

help-circle
  • (Thanks for actually engaging with the discussion).

    On another hand, if you prevent Linux adoption in a large demographic, you remove a threat to big tech’s dominance.

    Ok, sort of, maybe but this move is the move of big tech dominance. By caving to it, “linux” is positioning itself into a position of compliance with them, not opposition. What complying does is also removing the option to really oppose and evade big tech’s dominance.

    We’re simply entering the era where installing an illegal operating system becomes a thing that is possible, because previously nobody cared to make an operating system illegal. And I would to have many distros to choose from that don’t comply with this, but I will pick the wacky silly outlier if I hate to. At least I like to think of myself as doing that.







  • AA and indy games. A GTX 1060 usually won’t do for UE5 unless you accept severely degraded graphics.

    1. well yes, I do.
    2. I don’t usually play games like that, I think, you are free to name a few you think this is an issue for.
    3. indie art isn’t that “high cost of investment/valuable” anyway. Meaning, they don’t have 500 people creating high vertex count 4k textures everywhere. YAGNI, I don’t believe this is an issue in practice.
    4. UE is a commercial engine. With support and dev staff. And subscription pricing and everything. They can optimize?!
    5. Yes indies need to use the optimizations or build them themselves. Skill issue.

    I’m not calling you wrong, I doubt I could play “expedition 33” in “nice graphics”, but I have 0 interest in JRPGs, so it’s literally not a problem for me.



  • it_depends_man@lemmy.worldtoGames@lemmy.worldGames you fell out of love with.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I could write a book on eve online. That one is insidious. The hook is that you dream of getting the upgrade, which takes real world time to get, both in farming and in “skill training” time that’s passive and works while you’re offline but measured in real world time and can only be boosted but still takes months to do. So you sit there and think “oh boy it’ll be so cool when I finally can do X” and then you get it and it’s pretty much the same you were doing before, but bigger numbers.

    It also got community and then you have friends and don’t to leave your friendgroup

    And the devs? Deliver banger shows that show what they’re planning. Planning being sort of the catch, because in the nearly 15 years I’ve been watching what they’re doing, they did things I would call “correct”, one which they reverted (because the players were running away) and the other which they nerfed.


    More recently skilksong. All the elements for a fantastic game are there, art, especially the music are unbelievable. But upgrade system, the placing of where you can get them, what they actually do, some of the resources and currencies. That part just sucks.

    And for some reason, the game and the community ship the main character and a mass murdering psychopath? Just wild.



  • If I search “Iron” on wikipedia I’m looking for facts

    Not what I meant.

    The point is: there is an established group of editors, with established rules and preconceptions, an established interpretation on what good sources are and what a neutral perspective is and isn’t, and there is no chance of changing those and that is why I have no interest in interacting with wikipedia in any constructive way.

    I could talk about politics too, I picked video games because I know those articles are also bad.



  • Yes.

    Yet behind the celebrations, a troubling pattern has developed: The volunteer community that built this encyclopedia has lately rejected a key innovation designed to serve readers.

    But not that one, because rejecting AI 1) is not a generational rejection and 2) it is correct to reject it.

    What I think is or will be the generational problem: the community that maintains it and decides what is being accepted or rejected is an “in group” that it is impossible to break into with conflicting ideas. For example, I do think the gaming, game mechanics and game development related pages can be vastly improved. But I don’t think the people responsible for those pages are interested in the changes I would suggest.

    All the wikis for different games could just be on wikipedia. But they’re not, probably because they were rejected, because it’s “not relevant”. Well, some people decided they were relevant after all and they made their own wikis for those. The outcome is tribalism based fragmentation, because of differences in opinion of who values what and what should be preserved and what shouldn’t.