hopesdead

Is the shooter a person of color? Seriously, ask yourself that. Likely that is the citing factor for someone coming up with fucking bullshit like this. When the shooter is white, the defenders of gun rights will point to mental health. The point I am making is that POC will be a used as a scapegoat to upturn causes in society for their actions while a white person is largely upheld by gun rights advocates as a sign of failure to address mental health.

🤨

My mind immediately went there.

But Trump said recently that Israel has lost control of Congress.

So now being French and liking the French and anything French by extension is going to be made illegal in places.

Dude, you should have stopped using Spotify when they let Joe Rogan on their platform… or when they started hosting fake music.

If you are British and live in the UK and condone anything Israel has done, you are part of the problem historically. I’m not saying you shouldn’t have allowed for Palestine to exist, but you contributed to this mess with the Balfour Declaration.

EDIT: I am blaming the UK government and those who support the actions which in turn support Israel in this conflict.

It was restarted in like the last year.

That is only if they catch fire.

But they sold $43 million in 72 hours! /s

Are they still defending the fact they host Stormfront?

I didn’t read the article. I will admit this. I am only reacting to the headline.

No it isn’t but I still refuse to choose on purpose to listen to that song. I don’t even know the name.

EDIT: Just to be clear, I can’t stop from hearing the song out in the wild. However I will not seek it out. I just do not want to hear a song purposefully made with AI in such a manner. I’m still bitter that LOVE won a Grammy over the soundtrack to Across the Universe. They only gave the award to LOVE because George Martin was involved in it.

Says the dude who completed a song using AI.

You linked the same article from the post.

deleted by creator

This type of advertising isn’t new. There is that famous (although the claims from the father have been questioned) New York Times article written by Charles Duhigg in 2012. A father of a teenage girl in Minnesota got upset for receiving coupons from Target for infant care related products. As the story goes, he later learned his daughter was in fact pregnant. It turns out Target was using some predictive algorithm to identify would-be mothers and straight up sending them coupons for infant care products. It seems ever since this article was published that they stopped doing this in such a direct manner. Again, there have people who questioned the validity of the claims for this specific story, but Target did confirm they were doing this.

I’m sure they looked at Indian government and figured since they routinely discriminate the Muslim population he was in the clear.

Tell that to The Doctor! /s

But that isn’t a Meta company.

And there is a big chance those of us clearly not on there can’t see them post about that denial.