I believe the reason Fedora does this is to satisfy their regulatory goals, I don’t know the full story behind why they have their own seemingly broken build of OBS on their repo but I would imagine it has something to do with a codec’s worldwide licensing rights or similar. I believe the approach that should be taken is that Fedora should stop offering this package in a broken state as compared to continuing to do so, but that’s an outsider opinion.
They put their repo first on the list. Packages will default to Fedora’s repo if available. You may specify which version you want, if you both know that it’s happening and know that the package you want in particular is available at both.
I really again do not know how this could possibly be the fault of another repository. Fedora is making decisions for ther distro that circumvent FlatHub, this is not FlatHub’s fault.
This isn’t about Flathub. The problem is that Fedora has their own flatpak repo and the packages there take priority over the properly-maintained ones in FlatHub, per OBS.
Not that what you’ve mentioned is wrong, but in this comment section that’s a different topic than what we’re discussing.
Reporting about how the maps team reclassified the US as a “sensitive country”, a la: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/28/google-reclassifies-us-as-sensitive-country-like-china-russia-.html
Step two of the plan you outlined was inverted by Google, but the effect is the same: IIRC it only shows up that way for US users.
Edit: apparently that was either a lie or incomplete info, see comments elsewhere in this thread.
Prove your extraordinary claim.
I’m lucky enough to live over a business that allows me to use their Internet as a part of my lease, I do have 25Mbps. A marked upgrade from the non-business options in the area.
I would guess it’s to appeal to the greater United States audience of readers, as at least in my experience most people live in an area where speeds are still measured in the hundreds of Mbps. This would allow for a more direct and distinctly dramatic comparison.
It was a collaboration, although I’m having trouble finding a source for who wanted it first.
I think the reason for the distinction is that this is a community-led effort that was incorporated as an official patch for everyone on the actual game install delivered by storefronts, so it’s not entirely the same as modders releasing a patch on moddb or something like that.
Edit: and then I refreshed and there were a bunch of other similar comments lol, didn’t mean to dogpile.
Nano is the tool that people use when they don’t have a need for TUI editors in general and therefore don’t want to have to memorize how people with teletypes decided things should have been done 75 years ago and who also don’t want to get dragged into endless pointless bickering arguments about which set of greybeards was objectively right about their sets of preferences.
I’m glad people enjoy the editors they use and also I just wanna change a single fuckin line in a config file every once in a while without needing to consult a reference guide.
That was where it was uploaded first, the takedowns were for it being later hosted on azure cloud services