Communist

i switched to nixos after using arch for like 12 years.

https://areweanticheatyet.com/

for more info

tbh if you’re on linux there’s kind of an easy workaround

pactl load-module module-combine-sink sink_name='Stream' slaves='easyeffects_sink'

^^ I have this aliased as “gamesound”

easyeffects is great for this because it’ll just be the default sink, plus easyeffects makes your mic sound good anyway. (if you configure it for that)

then when the game opens i set it to output to “stream” and bam i can output game audio in a stream without capturing anything else, since i’m on hyprland i can also stream just the window, discord screenshare with audio everywhere.

this is about proper wayland support

That’s not true at all, that guy even wants a second one implanted for even more functionality, and he’s extremely happy with it.

a bunch of threads retracted but it still works, plus it seems they fixed that for future ones

edit: guys look i know elon musk bad but these are really the facts http://youtube.com/watch?v=Xlv4biIY6JI

No, I don’t think it’s wrong for it to be specified in the config files for hyprlands purposes, that’s standard tiling window manager stuff

https://wiki.hyprland.org/Configuring/Binds/#global-keybinds that’s a bug then, it should be working according to the docs.

honestly if this is for push to talk, i have a mic mute toggle in my config that might honestly be better depends on wireplumber and ripgrep though. If you bind it to something and then have it run again on release you can make it a proper push to talk key for every single application.

$micmute = wpctl set-mute @DEFAULT_SOURCE@ toggle ; wpctl get-volume @DEFAULT_SOURCE@ | rg -q 'MUTED' && notify-send ' Mic Muted' -h string:x-canonical-private-synchronous:mic-state || notify-send --urgency=low '  Mic unmuted' -h string:x-canonical-private-synchronous:mic-state

Chatgpt says

The text is a mix of hyperbole, hypothetical scenarios, and casual humor. Here’s an analysis of its content and style:

1. Subjectivity and Personal Preferences:

The first part expresses a strong personal aversion to grapefruit, emphasizing its status as the “only” food the speaker cannot eat. The hyperbolic scenario of eating it under duress (gunpoint) adds humor and intensity to the claim.

2. Hypothetical Swimming Scenario:

The second part transitions into a hypothetical situation involving a pool filled with fruit juice. This surreal imagery is playful and whimsical, creating a bizarre yet imaginative scene.

3. Practical Considerations:

The text includes practical observations (e.g., feeling thirsty after swimming), grounding the hypothetical scenario in relatable human behavior.

4. Tone and Style:

The tone is informal, conversational, and self-aware, with a meandering, stream-of-consciousness quality.

Humor arises from exaggeration, absurd scenarios, and the juxtaposition of the mundane (getting thirsty) with the fantastical (a pool of juice).

5. Logic and Consistency:

While entertaining, the text lacks strict logical coherence. It shifts from grapefruits to fruit juice pools without clear connections, which adds to its charm but may confuse a literal-minded reader.

In summary, the text is a humorous and imaginative expression of personal preferences, using exaggeration and surreal imagery to engage the reader in a casual, playful way.

Hyprland and kwin I think.

The hyprland dev is doing a ridiculous amount of work.

There’s precisely one reason I care, to increase compatibility with linux.

Once anticheat works perfectly on linux, I’ll completely stop caring what other people do. Everything else will come with time.

This is false. No party must run candidates.

I really don’t see why this matters at all. I feel like you’re trolling me. I didn’t mean must under threat, but must under tradition. Why do you care?

What you need to move this conversation forward is one of the following

1. How delegates are chosen in china, and proof it is unfair
2. Proof that ballots are being stuffed/some form of fraud.
3. Evidence that xi is actually unpopular and didn’t fairly win the election.

If you can provide none of the previous i don’t know why you’re talking to me.

There is no law saying that any party must run candidates or that there must only be two parties.

I never said any such law exists. I don’t know what point you’re making… another candidate in the running that had no chance to win? Should I care that vermin supreme was also running?

What you really need to demonstrate is that the elections in china are rigged/unfair, that’s the only way to really move forward in this conversation.

In order to do that you need one of two pieces of information:

1. How delegates are chosen in china
2. Proof that ballots are being stuffed/some form of fraud.

FDR exists in a two-party state where two parties must run candidates every single time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1944_United_States_presidential_election

Look at the map… they might as well have not run.

Oh, so you mean he’s president for life.

Yeah, in the same way that Franklin D. Roosevelt was, because of his popularity.

I support term limits but this ain’t the argument you think it is.

They hold elections regularly in Russia too. Who do you think always gets re-elected every time?

These elections are known to be rigged and you can easily find evidence that they are. I’m asking for evidence like this about China. You seem very confident about this, so, you must have some easily sourced evidence, no?

who runs against you in a one-party state?

??? everyone, because that’s how having one party works, everyone is part of the same party. One party doesn’t mean one candidate. It’s no different than if parties were abolished.

Who would even dare run against Xi?

Why would someone bother running against an extremely popular incumbent?

Term limits being removed doesn’t mean they don’t hold elections every 5 years… The US didn’t even start out with term limits.

…I never claimed they did?? They factually however, did not want fighting between political parties.

China doesn’t have presidents for life, they hold elections every five years.

They don’t because this is obviously fake…

radio free asia makes shit up all the time

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BO83Ig-E8E

it gets clicks and they’re an easy target so they just say whatever they think will get the most clicks.

China has a one party political system. This means, that there is no opposition. All members that may get elected to any position are picked by the CCP. All elections must adhere to the ruling of the CCP. The ruling of the CCP is part of the Chinese constitution.

How is this different from not allowing political parties at all, which is what the founding fathers of the US wanted, exactly?

I’m not arguing with you because i’m pro-china, I just don’t think that argument would land on someone who was pro-china. Furthermore that’s not evidence that the elections are rigged, i’m looking for evidence of poll-tampering, y’know, clear signs that the people did not choose which candidate won.

What is the process the CCP uses for choosing these delegates? I can’t find any information on that, that would be useful to have, i’ve been looking around for quite a while, articles have been unhelpful.

This doesn’t sound the slightest like a free democratic election.

Can’t this easily be said about the US with the whole electoral college thing?

Communists self-critical all the time.

I said that. You’re on the side that they shouldn’t be. You’re currently begging me not to be self-critical.

they don’t automatically think everything they do is good.

Yeah ofc nobody ever said they were all completely unreasonable, you must’ve imagined that.

I think you actually need to talk to communists instead of libs before you make this document.

already completely the plan… How am I supposed to make a steelman without cooperation from tankies??

You’re just going off propaganda news articles and third party hearsay.

Really, you know the full scope of the research i’m doing, which i haven’t shared with you and have determined this?

There aren’t any actual tankies in this thread so you’re not getting any first-hand information.

Of course there aren’t… why would you assume i’m getting all of my information from this thread or even lemmy?? I just wanted one articles primary source from here… you’re making so many bizarre assumptions.

It sounds like you’re using self-crit as an excuse to recycle and peddle lib propaganda and nonsense.

How would you know? Can you give me an example of lib propaganda that i’ve peddled?

Meanwhile, the US is on the verge of fascism.

Yes, that’s why i’m preparing documents.

You’re looking for reasons to make people not be communists rather than finding out why people should be.

Completely wrong, i’m looking for reasons to make people be communists despite the fact that tankies exist and make it sound awful.

I gotta say this is all just a ton of weird assumptions on your part that are completely baseless.