Is copyleft a requirement for FOSS?

Or maybe people don’t care about what their project looks like after releasing it?

P1 : Hey, I’ve used your code in my company project! P2 : Cool. I’ve got another job to do.

End

Maybe it is a violation when you are doing it all the time? Like, 24/7 you are using the whole resources available. Then yeah, I could see it.

Are you sure? Because that’s fucking dumb. If it was alà ISP, then it is understandable. Most ISP CANNOT GUARANTEE the maximum advertised speed, not outright violating ToS when you are able to use those full speed. Big difference there.

If systemd, of all things, manages to pull off universal packaging for linux, it would be funny lol

Power delivery with higher bandwidth than USB?

So does x86. The difference is license. Just like how Intel and AMD have a VERY different design (implementation) as of now, so does RISC-V. Any vendor can implement it however they want, but they won’t have to pay anyone for using RISC-V ISA

I’m being pedantic here but RISC-V is not a hardware architecture as in something that you can send to a manufacturer and get it made. It is an ISA. How you implement those ISA is up to you. Yes there are open implementations but I think it is important to distinguish it.