• 0 Posts
  • 62 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle

  • My problem with all this nonsense is that it doesn’t actually solve the problem, while causing many more. You’d need to fundamentally rethink the basic design of the technology if you were to actually prevent children from accessing sexual material with it.

    Absolutely - this always happens with these “save the children” laws.

    That’s something they don’t want to do, however, presumably because they’re addicted to the power it offers them to spy on everyone, and exploit the population for profit.

    Jesus Christ… You ever hear the phrase “never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by ignorance?” Politicians do this sort of “make the people feel like we’re doing something” shit all the time. They rarely consider the ramifications beside appeasing parents.



  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.workstoLinux@lemmy.mlUse arguments in shell script with apt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    For apt to install a local file I think you need either a fully qualified path or to use “./” at the start for a relative path.

    So “./$1/opensnitch_${1}_amd64.deb”

    apt install 1.6.5/opensnitch_1.6.5_amd64.deb 1.6.5/python3-opensnitch-ui_1.6.5_all.deb

    Edit: Here’s a better example of what I think you would want:

    #!/bin/bash
    # Often good to assign a numbered parameter to a variable
    VER="${1}"
    apt install "./${VER}/opensnitch_${VER}_amd64.deb" "./${VER}/python3-opensnitch-ui_${VER}_all.deb"
    

    Also - when debugging bash scripts it’s often helpful to just put “echo” before the line you’re questioning to see what exactly is being run. e.g.:

    #!/bin/bash
    VER="${1}"
    echo apt install "./${VER}/opensnitch_${VER}_amd64.deb" "./${VER}/python3-opensnitch-ui_${VER}_all.deb"
    

    That will show the the command that would have run rather than running it, then you can inspect it for errors and even copy/paste it to run it by hand.










  • I used to do this frequently “back in the day”…

    dd will create a complete bit-for-bit copy of the drive and put its contents into a file. All the way down to the boot sector, partitions, etc. Filesystem doesn’t even matter a little.

    I used to do something like “dd /dev/sda bs=1M | nc remote.server 1234” and then on the remote server “nc -l 1234 -p > file.img </dev/null”. I was swapping back and forth between Linux and Windows on a work laptop that I was using for non-work related things on the weekend, at conferences, etc.

    Wasn’t perhaps my most intelligent moment, but it worked!


  • It can be - but doesn’t have to be. It would depend on a lot of things including how reckless or negligent he was for example. And whether the local law considers “negligence” to be a factor in manslaughter or whether it’s considered to be “reckless endangerment” or something like that.

    A paramedic overheard Ms Hall saying Scarlett and her father were “play-fighting and chucking knives at each other”, Mr McKone said.

    In this case however… That’s pretty damn negligent.

    edit:

    When asked if he was responsible for causing his daughter’s death, Mr Vickers replied “I must be”, the court heard.

    As stupid as he was - this is pretty heart breaking…



  • It requires a near obsessive understanding of the architecture being emulated, but generally the process is “relatively straightforward” (though not necessarily “easy”). A CPU is a relatively simple device compared to the software built on it. Your basic steps are:

    1. Read an instruction
    2. Perform the instruction
    3. Jump to the next instruction

    Throw that in a loop and voilà! You have an emulator. Granted I’ve handwaved over a lot of complexity (I don’t mean to trivialize the effort)…

    To translate a binary is very different. Compilers optimize output to behave in a specific way for the target CPU that simply may not work on the new CPU. What do you do, for example, if the code was compiled for a platform that had 12 registers but the new one only has 6? You’d need to re-write the logic to work with fewer registers. That’s difficult to do in a way that is generic for any program. An emulator can just present the program with the 12 registers it expects (emulated in memory at the expense of performance).





  • I have an alias set up and SDKs enabled. The experience is indistinguishable from a regular install.

    That’s not indistinguishable - that’s you working around the problem of running flatpak run some.domain.IForget(which - BONUS is case sensitive which is awesome) to run neovim.

    Snaps install a binary you can run. Flatpaks make you remember the 3 part domain to run things. So you setup aliases after installing things to run them, and if you uninstall them you need to remove your aliases. It’s a complete own-goal by the flatpak developers that this mess exists and is completely unnecessary. Simply providing an option to create and manage a script in .local/bin or something would be all it takes to make flatpaks usable from the CLI in a way that isn’t obnoxious.