Lmao, what? Why even?

Because Trump is a moron surrounded by a team of idiots.

Well, even then, these islands are not significant geopolitical actors.

And yet they have tarrifs.

And tarrifs will certinly not hurt the Russian economy, and I doubt they are going to help the US in terms of geopolitics.

The same can be said if many of the other tariffs Trump has imposed. Which is why Russia’s exception is notable.

Solar panels lose efficiency when they heat up. Being on water can help keep them cool.

There are tariffs on uninhabited islands. Russia being an exception is notable.

The negative price drop is likely not good - long run. That’s the thing I’m talking about. If you can’t sell electricity you can’t maintain infrastructure. That will likely correct over time.

We heard similar responses about Trump’s first candidacy… Hopefully this sticks.

He’ll blame Obama.

Super good news.

Maybe… It’s good that peak production is so high, but there isn’t enough storage to take real advantage of it yet. And even if you’re not paying for power generation you still need to maintain power infrastructure. Maintenance isn’t free.

Kids…

And by all accounts Iran was compliant with the deal. Which went right out the window when Trump broke the deal.

Trump on Sunday warned of bombing Iran if Tehran fails to reach a deal over its nuclear program.

Just a reminder that we had a deal that Mr “art of the deal” broke.

According to the researchers, even though there are still about 4,700 tanks in storage, most of them will be difficult to restore due to their poor technical condition.

This is Russia though - “poor technical condition” is “ready for service.”

Let me check, I think they included me in it …

Uh oh, the one group in America you can’t fuck with - investors.

Decades of history burned by one asshole.

You high?

Waltz said not to worry because Elon Musk is on the case

🤣 Oh God we’re so screwed…

The important thing is that Kamala was taught a lesson. That lesson being that leftists will burn down the country over a single issue on which their stance will make no change.

Of course they didn’t accidentally add a reporter to their private group chat - that’s ridiculous! Obviously it was aliens who added him without them noticing. They have advanced technology to add group members in signal without anyone noticing.

This is one of the old-time original arguments in the OSS community.

The crux of the matter is that the GNU licenses require that modifications be released back to the community. Other “more permissible” licenses like MIT do not.

So if you want to make a commercial version of X, and X is under a GPL, then any changes you make need to be released under the GPL. The idea being “I shared this code with the community with the intent that you can use it for free and modify it as you like, but you need to share back what you do.” Also called “Share and share alike”.

This defends against “embrace, extend, extinguish” tactics that companies like Microsoft has loved to do. They can’t take your code, modify it for their own purposes and re-sell it possibly making a more popular version that is now proprietary.

I look forward to his “nobody knew this would be so difficult” statement.