Frederica Matteoni (writing in German for Berliner Zeitung) probably has checked her sources.
Second paragraph in the piece:
“Oday Nasser Al Rabay’s body was dumped outside his family’s home over the weekend, report Times of Israel and other Israeli media, citing statements from relatives.”
Plenty of other journalists posting anti Trump content without problem. If you’re too scared to use words to mildly criticize power, you shouldn’t be a journalist in the first place. They didn’t become cowards due to Trump’s new hyper fascism, they’ve been like that the whole time.
Looks like they updated the title: “Vance accuses Denmark of not keeping Greenland safe from Russia, China”
But really, journalists don’t need to pretend any of this is legitimate. Add a “dubiously” in there. This is obviously not a sincere complaint. Stop assuming good faith just because he’s got an official title.
Revoke their visa mid visit and send them to an undisclosed detention center in a glacier.
It was just one bad apple. Who probably won’t be punished for being bad.
The purpose of a system is what it does.
Neoliberals neoliberaled.
Never was there ever a poll with 90% of Democrats in support of Israel’s war. Usually the strong majority of Democrats wanted it stopped. You’re just writing fan fiction here so you can feel good about dismissing a genocide as a worthwhile political event.
Never was there ever a poll with 90% of Democrats in support of Israel’s war. Usually the strong majority of Democrats wanted it stopped. You’re just writing fan fiction here so you can feel good about dismissing a genocide as a worthwhile political event.
“These invasions, collectively called the Egg Wars…”
Absolutely do it. Obviously an American president is never going to actual be put on trial, but let’s get an official determination so it’s not like we’re just pretending the concept doesn’t apply if you’re from a powerful Western nation.
As a single state no less.
My mistake. If that was your whole correction, why didn’t you just say that in the first place?
As with anything regarding international law it’s kind of just agreements and power. You can just break treaties whenever and it will only matter if someone with power then tries to punish you for it.
But Greenland isn’t fully independent. The Netherlands Denmark controls its foreign policy and provides for its defense. They do have an option to vote to leave that relationship, but Denmark also sends a lot of money Greenland needs to make their budgets, so it’s not a trivial decision to just leave.
Edit: Wrong country
They didn’t. The Netherlands Denmark did, and the results of arbitration are both not prescribed (you can sue for a billion dollars for emotional damage in court, it doesn’t mean you’re going to get it) and can potentially be rejected by national courts.
Edit: Used the wrong county.
Russia isn’t in any way a threat to expand their invasion. If they could simultaneously invade Poland they wouldn’t be struggling so hard to reclaim their own territory, let alone conquer Ukraine. China is the one powerful and expansive enough to worry about.
The definition isn’t wrong, they just didn’t read it correctly. Those things in the UN convention are methods that could be used to “cause the destruction of a people”. They’re spelled out to avoid people misinterpreting the definition just like they did.
Yes, and you can destroy a group by means other than killing its members, such as forced sterilization, systematic abuse, or the transfer of children away from the community. It’s the demo that’s being killed, not necessarily its individual members.
Genocide also doesn’t imply killing.
That’s making a lot of assumptions about someone solely citing Israeli papers and not claiming to have any direct sources in Gaza. What makes you think this particular woman has in any way corroborated them? She’s not saying she has an anonymous source and putting her reputation on the line, she’s openly citing other journalists.
Is she in some way a particularly reputable journalist who would be inherently careful about Israeli propaganda or having some inherent objectivity? All I see from her regarding Gaza is things boosting the Israeli government’s narrative, including a “one year later” piece criticizing anti-Israeli currents in the left, talking about how she went to that music festival years earlier, and called herself as a Zionist.