Make drones that drop very loud paint/dye bombs to send a message.

Peppered with questions? Is that all?

Fight the good fight.

Want to become the modern nazi party … then suffer from brain drain exactly like the old one did.

I hate the fact that it had to be the US that fell to these fascists… but at least it put the rest of the world on notice.

Really? I was already planning to check it out, 2 people in my D&D group are going to try it … now I really really want to.

I just hope that PvP is not a requirement. That ruins games.

Yea, I may not be able to sit for the entire “game helping” timeframe that the dev has decided needs to be played at one time.

Now Trump has a lever to pull for more insider trading. He will let the economy crumble for a while longer, then tell his friends “now is the time to invest” and then agree to remove all tariffs a few hours later. Then the economy will recover sharply from the insider trading spike and fall again when these vulture capitalists are done.

This is exactly what MAGA voted for. When Trump started talking about tariffs liberals started talking about how the last string of tariffs started a trade war that turned a depression into “The Great Depression”.

When Trump started saying the word tariff, Republicans googled “what is tarrif” (spelled wrong)

Trump stepping down won’t do shit. This is a MAGA issue, and is exactly what they voted for.

Let it burn.

So fucking sick of this Russian traitor in office.

Man I miss SWG.

This is actually a correct assessment for the state I live in

Picking up someone’s conversation by accident like this is 100% inadmissible in court. It is also likely to get whomever is trying to utilize the recording sued.

Filming an interaction is different, that is where the expectation of privacy standard occurs.

Wire tapping went a bit crazy for a while there and needed to be made illegal/inadmissible.

My state takes it a step further. You must be a consistent active participant in the conversation. The driver of a vehicle you are riding in likely would not qualify as he is not there as part of the conversation. There is no way possible that having every conversation in a car automatically recorded would be legal in my state.

Hearing a conversation and recording it are two different things. Single party consent means one of the people being recorded must give permission to record … full stop. If there is no consent then a warrant is required.

Not in my state, and not by most two party laws. This is VERY specific and clear in my state: The driver is outside the conversation.

By your rational a police agent without a warrant could walk by and say “hello”, plant a listening device, then record your conversation because he said hello at the start. This is specifically not two party (I spot checked several state laws). It would be illegal in many states (mine included).

Don’t you have to be participating in the conversation? Our state’ single party consent specifically excludes “walk ups” and “back grounders”. For instance a waiter at a restaurant cannot record a table’s conversation just because he said a few words. Also a person cannot say “hello” and then quietly sit by and record you.

The person doing the recording must be an active and constant participant in the conversation, otherwise the recording is illegal.

I think of that guy all the time. He had it … he was there.

Yea, I saw him spinning in those circles and knew another rapist had join the “conservative” party.

Hopefully the political correction happens fast. The last two tariff wars created massive depressions. The Great depression saw a landslide democratic victory and it took Republicans 60 years to become relevant again. This could be good.