Under the bills, some kinds of local telecom projects would be approved automatically if a city or town doesn’t rule within a deadline set by Congress.

The tl;dr

Have chronic diarrhea so they can’t trace a single log back to you.

I wanna see that tattoo in 5+ years when it settles. Seems like fine detail is going to lose its sharpness regardless of whether it’s a human or a robot on the other end of the needle.

Can’t resist. What did Lumo say when you asked it about Proton’s privacy and security?

I want to run a bit faster than my hiking buddy to avoid being caught by the bear. I want my car or bike to look more of a pain to steal than the one parked next to it.

There’s no perfect privacy. I want to outpace my peers so that they are the more attractive targets.

same wages and less jobs to go around

If we’re lucky. It’s more likely to be lower wages. “We don’t need to pay experienced programmers anymore, they aren’t writing the code after all. We just need cheaper, less skilled people to review the code that is already 99% fine”.

💯 Not about the tech, it’s about who is going to use the tech to make life worse for the working class.

I don’t think there is an LLM in this application. Not all AI tools involve LLM.

Never heard of it. Not gonna look into it because I’m 50/50 on you being affiliated with the app and posting this just to drive clicks.

Assuming you are legit, best of luck finding an alternate you’re happier with.

My sister is a teacher and now has her students repeat back to her, “LLMs are not search engines”.

Ok if at the behest of domestic powers tho

Lol, only if he were a lot poorer and a lot less white. That mother fucker launched a UK political party, acquired citizenship to Vanuatu, and rubbed elbows with the American Right in Florida. All within 2025 year to date.

I asked an LLM client to name my last batch of homebrew. It suggested, “Phresh Pilsner”. My 90 year old grandma would think that’s lame AF.

"It all starts with data, data, data, data. No company on Earth stores or computes more data than Dell today. We have a treasure trove, our customers have a treasure trove of their information.”

Sam Grocott, Dell SVP of product marketing

https://siliconangle.com/2024/05/31/transforming-infrastructure-dells-advanced-ai-integration-delltechworld/

Just say it, man, “we have a treasure trove of our customers’ information”.

The DHS cannot enforce anything if the majority of Americans refuse to get real ids.

That ship has sailed. Some states have been issuing them since 2012. Multiple political leaders from both sides opposed it: both Clintons, Ron Paul, Mike Huckabee, Obama. And advocacy groups on both sides opposed it: guns rights activist to immigrant rights activists to domestic violence aid groups. Too little, too late to swim against the post-9/11 security theater that George W Bush used to speedrun introducing so many bad things.

And the “what ifs” you presented are far from the worst they can do with it

And I’m saying that in many states your lack of consent doesn’t matter (legally speaking). Your consent is not required if someone else decides to record with their device.

I don’t like it. Just stating that you declining to consent does nothing if someone else records you and gives the recordings to the police. That’s not a search of you or your possessions, that’s a search of someone else’s recording that did not require your consent to be made.

None of this is new, just increasingly insidious and ubiquitous.

Your consent doesn’t matter (legally) in a single-party consent state. Which includes some bigs like New York and Texas. California is a two-party consent state though, so theoretically these people should be informing each other that they are using recording equipment.

Replying with a competing point because arguments are even more engaging! You silly goose, Luddite, woke boomer. Get a life and watch some Fox News and/or CNN.

Only 75 out of 287,000 layoffs this year attributed to AI replacement, yet further down, IBM alone has replaced “hundreds” of HR employees with AI. Which is it?

Absolute trash article. Any vague gesture in the direction of a fact is poorly defined with no sources. This should only increase skepticism towards AI replacing writers and journalists.

But one shouldn’t have to.

So an applicant with dangerous people in their life, maybe an abusive family member or a stalker ex, is forced to expose their accounts they would otherwise keep private. That’s the first bad-case scenario that comes to mind, I’m sure there are more.

I propose a new rule - if so for me, then so for thee. Anything imposed on legal applicants is also imposed on the lawmakers who put it in place.