You accidentally a word.

That’s the other way around.

I’m not a Nazi, I just admire their personnel picks. And their economic policy. And their uniforms. And the killing of some jews. But I’m not a Nazi!

They are quite good, at least those with a steering wheel. Roomy, very efficient, very little maintenance, great performance, fun to drive, good charging network, nice software. Aren’t perfect or maybe not even the best these days but it would be a shame to have a couple millions cars go to the landfill because of one Nazi.

Whoa dude, Americans can see this! Don’t say that!

Even if you are evil as fuck, there are better and dare I say, cheaper, options to commit your war crimes.

Specially as far as Malta. That doesn’t make even sense.

Damn this AI, posting and doing all this mayhem all by itself on poor unsuspecting humans…

Support for one. Very often you need 24/7 support with an SLA for every part of the stack.

Maybe features? Not familiar with them, but often happens that enterprise features are behind an enterprise license. Stuff like LDAP integration, encryption with KMIP management, Kerberos, etc.

Third, management tooling. Monitoring, optimization, backups, debugging, what have you.

Most of the lemmy audience skews to Libre Software, but enterprise land doesn’t care about all of the reasons listed in this thread, they were on the commercial license to begin with.

Well, nobody knew healthcare, middle east, Ukraine was so complicated.

Fortunately for Ukraine, all they really got was a photo OP.

Well, I don’t believe so, but as you said it’s ultimately for a court to test it.

That wording is pointing to reselling the program or the same functionality. Of course if your service is “fast key based data retrieval” it would violate the definition, but something like “low latency gaming notifications” would not, because the value is gaming notifications, something redis doesn’t offer. Same as if your service uses encryption in transit, you’re not just reselling openssl.

deleted by creator

Agree on the court, but the wording is super specific. Doesn’t matter if you couldn’t build it without a redis-like component, because of the speed or whatever, it is targeting “offering the program as a service”. There’s even an FAQ on the mongodb (SSPL authors) site regarding this. Unless your program is just a proxy to access redis, you’re fine.

I don’t think that’s correct. It maybe prohibits people from building a service to offer redis to third parties on Windows, but you can run redis in your stack on whatever OS you want, as long as what you are building is not “redis as a service”. So any end-user SaaS that just uses redis as a cache is not bound to section 13.

And even if you built a redis as a service, the operating system is not explicitly mentioned in the license, so it would be for a lawyer to say whether that’s required…

My comment was a joke.

I mean… he didn’t say they are at the bottom because they are white.

Maybe they are at the bottom of the list because they are dumb as rocks, and happen to be white. And he knows being dumb in America is no impediment, so he wants the asylum.

Because it has a very specific meaning.

So damn relatable.