data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e478b/e478b8a94e18292fb1040e7ed7e7c5d8e231c7b4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd2a/cfd2a1dbdaa2a4665edc5da6ca698927da8c09c6" alt=""
I hope this is a clear enough sign of who not to give power to.
I hope this is a clear enough sign of who not to give power to.
Can reporters ask what will happen if they don’t voluntarily leave?
Gotcha, thank you for being civil in your explanation. I appreciate you taking the time to break that down!
I mean, one thing to keep in mind is that the Republicans stopped caring about optics once they secured the govt. They can now say and do what they want with little to no repercussions.
So, calling out their hipocrisy is good for documentation sake, but sadly, that is about it.
The idea was to point users to a site that looks at an overview of past issues with a news source. I was unaware that this specific site was very loose with their grading of news sites.
I am not sure if you are aware, but in online forums, it is rare that someone will even read past the headline before giving their opinion. Expecting everybody to dedicate the time and effort for a thorough inspection of every news provider and their sources is a bit of a high ask, especially now with people trying to manage their lives and the onslaught of political breaking news.
If you would like to do a service to people, you can mention what your research has come to in those various areas. If they are skeptical, they can then double check your work.
Thanks for the heads up. I was not aware of this.
Please do! With it’s current behavior, the US does not deserve to sit at the adult table.
Use 12ft.io if you are getting paywalled.
Money