Theyre almost certainly depending on the money brought in by all those tickets
It’s where my great grandparents came from! Homeward bound!
I’ve got a sign up sheet going for New England secession if anyone wants in
They think they found someone it is ok to hate, and they are all in. Probably voted for trump.
It’s not. The cruelty is a means to ensuring they remain in power. Remaining in power no matter what is the point.
Would grapheneOS work well on a Boox Tab Ultra C?
Can you provide a single real life example of an apple “fanboy” that you have encountered?
I’m having trouble conceptualizing the words you just used in my brain.
I dunno, are meals provided in the locked room? The world is a pretty fucking awful place right now.
I can get on board with this
Only if you invest in MELANIA
For what?
Eh. Just burn more coal. What could go wrong??
So this immediately raised just a couple of red flags as I read it. I know everyone hates LLMs, but this would have taken me forever to research and put together, so I fed ChatGPT 4o my concerns and questions, and asked for context, explanations of referenced materials, and analysis. Then I went back and forth a bit more to make sure everything was in a logical order and nothing was left out. I found this extremely helpful.
Date Signed: March 20, 2025
On March 20, 2025, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order entitled “Stopping Waste, Fraud, and Abuse by Eliminating Information Silos.” The order’s stated purpose is to eliminate barriers to federal inter-agency data sharing to reduce waste, fraud, and inefficiency. However, the scope and language raise significant legal and constitutional concerns.
Federal Funding and Authority:
Potential Conflicts with Privacy Laws:
First Amendment Risks:
Overreach into State Data Sovereignty:
“Self-Justifying” Legal Language:
While seeking to increase efficiency, this executive order raises sweeping legal and constitutional issues. The forced access to state-held and third-party data, disregard for privacy protections, and language designed to avoid legal accountability are likely to face serious judicial review. Conditions for data access cannot be imposed retroactively or without clear statutory authority.
In short: Receiving federal funds does not automatically waive privacy protections or grant federal control. The order’s legality will ultimately depend on court interpretation.
I guess Google didn’t bribe hard enough
Well, wouldn’t you?
You mean Republicans? Yeah they won’t allow that, silly