

How is it that pokemon has a hold on things like animals allowing flight, but gliders allowing flight isn’t under patent?
Like, whoever did gliders first needs to sue Nintendo to change breath of the wild, no gliders allowed anymore.
How is it that pokemon has a hold on things like animals allowing flight, but gliders allowing flight isn’t under patent?
Like, whoever did gliders first needs to sue Nintendo to change breath of the wild, no gliders allowed anymore.
Also, why does the system even allow people to claim more than they are entitled? Is there no maximum set into the payment field or whatever they have for it?
That depends on there still being elections
Tune in on Monday to find out new tarriffs make this announcement no longer valid
I don’t understand what justification El Salvador has for keeping a man imprisoned who never broke any of their laws. Can I pay them to hold my neighbour in prison? How much does it cost?
I found humankind to be very difficult to go the domination path, but I haven’t played since close to release.
It was very prohibitive to take direct control of conquered cities as the cost seemed exponential, and you had to constantly declare peace and then go right back to war or something if I remember correctly. It seemed like a silly system
But muh culture!
The problem I mostly have is even when those costs are recouped most companies fight tooth and nail to keep the prices high and unaffordable in order to line the pockets of investors.
I don’t even mind microtransactions, but microtransactions DO NOT EXIST
$10 for a skin is not a MICRO transactions, that’s just a transaction.
The entire game costs $60 but ONE skin out of the thirty that already available or whatever is somehow $10? Why do people pay that? Why would they ever bother making a new game when they can design 6 new skins instead?
Are investors idiots? He’s just going to change his mind again in three days
Keep those counter tarriffs, fuck Trump let him know he can’t just make silly threats and then change his mind
Why is that a problem? It gets rid of bias and would actually help minorities defeat bias in the court and get a more fair judgement.
Yeah honestly I don’t see a problem with this. If it’s his own words why does it matter if it’s AI speaking or himself? Even if it’s not his own words, he could just as easily say the same shit on camera, why does the person in the video needs to be him?
…4…5…6…7…8…
Trump on Monday… “Canadian tarriffs now 55%!”
Why?
So the Twitter boss gets to order around the Reddit boss? Typical Stevie… No spine
Nice, I was just about to consider getting a new Subaru myself. Hoping for a flood of excess stock now.
Yeah, I didn’t mean that’s the only thing that could possibly ever be done tiehr I’m not an archaeologist or whatever would be relevant.
Maybe it would be possible to just encase it is a giant glass cube, who knows. But is nothing the best thing to be doing? I’m just asking.
I can see why patents are so long when you need to build like a billion dollar factory to make a product and mass produce it.
Digital concepts don’t take that much investment and once you have it you don’t need to invest in making more, it’s just there.
So yes, digital patents should be a fraction of the time that physical patents should be. Like 2 years instead of 20.