If a website doesn’t load correctly, that’s the websites issue. My browser loads every other website fine. If I have to disable an ad blocker to see your content, that means I don’t want to see your content, because it’s an ad.

I’ve never owned a laptop with a GPU, very interesting how that works.

Is it something works out of the box, or do you have to manually set it up?

TIL. Thank you

I’m going to assume that it is possible to put both the dedicated and integrated GPUs to work, though I’ve never seen this kind of setup.

This is likely not something you want to actually do.

The integrated GPU in your processor is not an additional bit of computing power your computer is not using, but special software that can use your processor to put out graphics if a dedicated GPU is missing. It is extremely inferior at processing graphics compared to the real dedicated GPU, and if you were running firefox to watch (Not decode) youtube, you would very likely see things like screen tearing as the processor struggled to keep up.

If you wanted to do this just to see the outcome for yourself, you could switch your displayport cable to your monitor to connect to your motherboard instead of your GPU to get an idea of how rough this would be. If you wanted to continue after seeing this, I believe you would need to connect a 2nd monitor in order to use both the dedicated and integrated GPUs.

Constant CEO turnover? Bringing in a AWS/Oracle Executive? RIP Docker.

So if stealing copyrighted information to train an AI isn’t fair use, then isn’t pretty much every commercial LLM illegal?

Jeep is a Stellantis product. Literally the worst quality auto manufacturer in North America. They are circling the drain and jacking up the prices on their vehicles and making Pikachu faces when they don’t sell. Their only customers are people who don’t know how to research their purchases, and putting advertisement hell into their cars is another example of that. I suspect they will not be in business a decade from now.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

This is misinformation.

Forrest also considered heart-rending testimony from two parents of Silk Road customers who died after consuming drugs. Prior to sentencing, the defense submitted a report from a forensic pathologist who detailed the lack of evidence to support the contention that drugs purchased on Silk Road caused those deaths or four others cited by the government. But Forrest deemed those incidents relevant because she concluded, based on “a preponderance of the evidence,” that “the deaths, in some way, [were] related to Silk Road.”

https://reason.com/2025/01/20/why-trump-should-keep-his-promise-to-free-silk-road-founder-ross-ulbricht/

Edit:

Page 33 off the appeal shows what breakfastmtn said to be accurate. https://web.archive.org/web/20221213001237if_/https://pdfserver.amlaw.com/nlj/ULBRICHT-ca2-20170531.pdf

Thank you for following up with that