• 1 Post
  • 51 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle
  • From a budget phone to a flagship?

    Yeah, i can see how the difference would be night and day…

    Regardless pixel is a great series of phone if the OS works for you then stick with google phones.

    Personally i like samsung. Even if they have gotten pretty shady. Since i owned the s2 years back i have always found myself liking samsung.

    Tried nexus 6, tried the OG pixel which i liked but ruined when i dropped it in a barrel filled with potatos and water. (No k wont elaborate, its more fun to leave you guessing)

    Tried huawei and enjoyed my p20 pro and p30 pro but once the fold 3 came out i was back with samsung. Got a fold 6 now and am very happy.

    If i recall, since the advent of smart phones, i went: Sony xperia x10, Galaxy S2, Galaxy S4 mini, Google Nexus 6, Google Pixel, Huawei P20 pro, Huawei P30 pro, Galaxy Fold 3, Galaxy Fold 6,


  • Since when did gfx cards need to cost more than a used car?

    We are being scammed by nvidia. They are selling stuff that 20 years ago, the equivalent would have been some massive research prototype. And there would be, like, 2 of them in an nvidia bunker somewhere powering deep thought whilst it calculated the meaning of life, the universe, and everything.

    3k for a gfx card. Man my whole pc cost 500 quid and it runs all my games and pcvr just fine.

    Could it run better? Sure

    Does it need to? Not for 3 grand…

    Fuck me!..










  • It’s all relative. If i sit a few meters away from a 50 inch screen, then it’s roughly the same size as a phone screen held 30cm from my face. It’s just a matter of perspective.

    The level of detail i can see is the same. My fancy earbuds make the sound quality essentially the same if not better.

    The only real difference is i have to hold the phone to watch it.

    Well, most people… not me, I have a folding phone with a stand, so for me, i can comfortably put the phone on a table on the stand that’s built into the case and watch from there. Works just fine.


  • Absolutely fair. An 8 year old game should not cost $90 all in.

    I dont dispute that. I just think the article is misleading as there is a lot of talk about $90 switch 2 games, which turned out not to be true, and it creates anger that is misplaced. Even if the reality isn’t far from that lie.

    I do, however, think it’s an interesting thought experiment to come at it from another angle.

    Imagine the article was “8 year old AAA game and DLC at a huge discount” and the article said things like:

    • breath of the wild was ahead of its time on release
    • the graphics still look great thanks to the cell shading and art style
    • unique gameplay elements and a modern feeling combat system
    • vast open world with expansive storyline
    • on par with modern games
    • currently only $50 on this deal, a bargain considering everything you get for that price

    From this point of view i think you would agree that anyone would argue its worth more than $50 and that its a great deal despite being 8 years old.

    Nintendo games should definitely come down in price over time, but the point is its just so easy to spin something however you want if you use the right words.


  • Title is a bit misleading

    There are a few scenarios here.

    1. You own the game on switch and already have the dlc so pay nothing unless you want to pay $10 or have the switch online subscription for the switch 2 edition if you want the enhancements. For a total of $0-10 depending on your choice

    2. You own the game but dont have the dlc so pay $20 for that and then $10 for the switch 2 version unless you have the subscription for a total of $20-30 depending on your choice.

    3. You dont own the game so you buy the switch 2 version for $70 and the dlc for $20 for a total of $90.

    This is not the same as the $90 game lie thats being told, but it is painted that way. To get clicks.

    Paying $70 for a game and then paying more for an expansion is nothing even close to new. For example, Destiny 2 is free but if you want the DLC its gonna cost you between $150 and $270 depending on when you buy it as there are sometimes deals on.






  • But its LOWER than inflation. And its based on misinformation.

    Is your argument against nintendo, or all game pricing?

    If its all game pricing then i agree with you. Like i said in my “essay” games are too expensive.

    If its against nintendo specifically then its not even correct. There are no 100 dollar switch 2 games. There are no 90 dollar switch 2 games. Thats factually incorrect and i implore you to find proof. I will shut my mouth if you do.

    80 dollars? Sure. But as i said in my “essay” thats nothing new. And its not exclusive to nintendo.

    All i am saying is your rage is misplaced and you need to know your enemy.


  • In fact. I dont care if you realise it or not. I dont need your validation. Im in my 30s. I’m nearly 40. i have been gaming since the sega master system. That’s fairly early doors for gaming. Its super early for console gaming. I know what i am talking about, i have been alive for long enough and paid for enough games to know what i am talking about.

    The fact that you are just going to downvote me and offer absolutely nothing to counter my argument is enough for me to know you are EITHER too young to k ow about any of this, or being purposfully ignorant to jump on the rage wagon.

    The fact you automatically think i am schilling for nintendo because my argument passively defends them (its actually an argument defending all game pricing) is just evidence of your immaturity.

    Grow up, eh?