data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e478b/e478b8a94e18292fb1040e7ed7e7c5d8e231c7b4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd2a/cfd2a1dbdaa2a4665edc5da6ca698927da8c09c6" alt=""
New USA colonialism:
“Let us help you fight for your freedom!”
3 years later…
“Ekhmm… remember the aid we sent? It wasn’t to help you fight freedom after all. It was so now we can feel entitled to your resources.”
Check mate.
New USA colonialism:
“Let us help you fight for your freedom!”
3 years later…
“Ekhmm… remember the aid we sent? It wasn’t to help you fight freedom after all. It was so now we can feel entitled to your resources.”
Check mate.
This would be a great fit for a r/NotTheOnion type of sub.
I don’t need to read an article to know that “no” is the correct answer the question in the title.
I totally get all the concerns related to AI. However, the bandwagon of: “look it made a mistake, it’s useless!” is a bit silly.
First of all, AI is constantly improving. Remember everyone laughing at AI’s mangled fingers? Well, that has been fixed some time ago. Now pictures of people are pretty much indistinguishable from real ones.
Second, people also make critical mistakes, plenty at that. The question is not whether AI can be absolutely accurate. The question is whether AI can make on average fewer mistakes than human.
I hate the idea of AI replacing everything and everyone. However, pretending that AI will not be eventually faster, better, cheeper and more accurate that most humans is wishful thinking. I honestly think that our only hope is legislation, not the desperate wish that AI will always need human supervision and input to be correct.
Is it me or are there guts in this picture?
Also, if only there could be more than one country stabbing the other in the back.