ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝

No, they just want to control the internet because they are afraid of it. To be honest, it’s not without reason after the Arab Spring and then the current disinformation wars.

This is not the way to do it though.

I guess it’s harder on them as well since Epstein got killed, the royal nonce is also less dignified nowadays.

Only in concentration camps.

Building a moon colony and preserving it all in a museum around the lander with all the explanation text in Chinese would be such a flex though.

Like “these are archaic artefacts of an empire of old”.

If there aren’t many, they could use attack helicopters with their swivel guns. Fly above, check if nothing important is below / behind the drone, then shoot.

Both them and China try very hard not to.

You have been banned from ml - stating that anyone other than the US starts wars is McCarthyist propaganda.

Same way the US police uses guns

Bring out the artillery!

To their merit, France starts remarkably few wars while hiding under their nuclear umbrella. And I know they still do fucked up shit, especially on their colonies but at least they are not invading Catalonia or Sardinia.

A birth that moves from the 20s to the 30s is still a birth, and while a lot of what you’re saying is happening - I know it first hand - it’s incomparable in magnitude to not having four kids between 14 and 18.

I’ve read somewhere that most of the decline in birth rates in developed countries comes from the end of teenage pregnancies.

Tweets can be monetised? I only know Twitter from screenshots.

It has it, the French decided to share theirs a while ago.

FWIW official policy is that if US soldiers attack Greenland / Denmark, Washington goes to play Fallout.

For reference, he’s Orbán’s Göbbels. He’s been arguably the most influential person in the government pretty much since the first Orbán government.

He’s been one if not the biggest key to Orbán’s power, and an absolute psychopath.

It’s broad consensus that’s featured there, so it manufactures consent less hard, and more importantly, the fact-check appears attaches to the original misinfo, so it gets reshared with it.

Who “everyone else”?

All other countries respect Danish sovereignty. The international court does not recognise breakaways by referenda anyway. See Catalonia, Scotland and countless other examples.

If anything, an attempted hostile takeover of Denmark would have us find out whether Swedish coastal subs can replicate their exercise results in actual combat and sink a few US carriers.

Also, the official status quo of the consequences of a broad US invasion of Europe is that the French will glass Washington and most major US cities with their nuclear subs, while international trade will be paralysed and the Chinese will become the sole superpower.

I always imagine yodeling kangaroos from these comments

Yeah, but if we go that way, they could accept the money, pretend they sold the place, and then just go “sike”. Legal by decree of the Danish crown, suckers.

They don’t need to.

They only have to remove your personal data. So the company / AI model is not allowed to have data specifically on you, but it can have the average age of people living in your town even if your data contributed to calculating that average.

That said, Apple here never had affirmative consent, so they can’t get away with just doing this.