I’m fairly sure the Communications Commission regulates information services. Even this guy at the notorious Federalist Society’s blog says it does.

https://books.google.com/books?id=wL2UDIPp2dMC&q=mozilla+mosaic+killer+newman&pg=PA115#v=snippet&q=mozilla+mosaic+killer+newman&f=false https://webaim.org/blog/user-agent-string-history/ https://www.davetitus.com/mozilla/

In fact I don’t think he ever worked for Mozilla besides just making Mosaic/Netscape. Does @resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee not realize “Mozilla” stands for “Mosaic Killer”?

They don’t have that authority‽

While other new students fretted over the university’s rigorous core curriculum, described by the school as “intellectually expansive” and “personally transformative,” Lee used AI to breeze through with minimal effort.

Lee goes on to claim everyone cheats. (He’s also that AI Amazon Leetcode interview person.)

Lee said he doesn’t know a single student at the school who isn’t using AI to cheat.

Well duh, what other kind of people would he know.

Yeah, I understand. 🤗

When I asked him why he had gone through so much trouble to get to an Ivy League university only to off-load all of the learning to a robot, he said, “It’s the best place to meet your co-founder and your wife.”

it’s been heading in the opposite direction, fortunately, if collegeboard is to be representative

deleted by creator

lol no problem

This Private Search is just a standalone website (and not part of the browser). And yes, Waterfox the browser does support WebExtensions, as it includes Firefox Quantum features.

the search engine, a website?

That would make sense! Good for them!

these jokes get me every time. last time someone said something like “earthfox, airfox, lived together in harmony…”

I use it for the default interface customizations and tree-style sidebar. I personally don’t care that much about the very basic level of Firefox’s telemetry, but yes, Waterfox bundles the Betterfox config to shut down trackers plus overall just make itself faster.

I know prohibiting reselling is what they probably intended. But that doesn’t mean they can’t push a different and very valid interpretation when they want to.

you’re not just reselling openssl.

The wording—“primarily derives from”—is much broader than “just”. I believe that Resque’s dependence on Redis is enough to satisfy “primarily”.

To be fair, it was introduced as meta-search in the Waterfox changelog where it was publicized.

I feel like it qualifies under

offering a service the value of which entirely or primarily derives from the value of the Program or modified version

Doing it fast is essential and a core part of many services’ value, I’m sure.

You have a point regarding the FAQ but I do not see that written in the license. This is a problem that would only be granted in case MongoDB/ElasticSearch/Redis sues someone for internal use and I think that’s a borderline risk too much to take.

Well, it’s how I would interpret it, especially for Windows being a violation of section 13 (a little less for whether section 13 applies when you just use Redis: one could argue it applies to dynamic sites that really require fast responses as part of its feature set, which has to use something like Redis). It’s also an issue that nobody has interpreted the license in court yet.

Sorry, I didn’t see the notification for some reason. The SSPL would prohibit people from running Redis from Windows, as Windows is proprietary. That forces them to use the source-available RSAL.