Summary

A new Innofact poll shows 55% of Germans support returning to nuclear power, a divisive issue influencing coalition talks between the CDU/CSU and SPD.

While 36% oppose the shift, support is strongest among men and in southern and eastern Germany.

About 22% favor restarting recently closed reactors; 32% support building new ones.

Despite nuclear support, 57% still back investment in renewables. The CDU/CSU is exploring feasibility, but the SPD and Greens remain firmly against reversing the nuclear phase-out, citing stability and past policy shifts.

      • sensiblepuffin@lemmy.funami.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        We made a mistake, and to make up for it, we should right the mistake. Unbelievable the way people’s brains just switch off when it comes to nuclear power.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, people just think “nuclear = good” without considering the time to build new reactors, the economic efficiency, and similar factors.

          • sensiblepuffin@lemmy.funami.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s true. People also discount nuclear because it’s a scary word. We should be researching any and all renewables, or we’re all going to have a very bad few decades (if we make it that far).

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Sure, I’m not against research! But I am against diverting investments from renewables to nuclear, because this unavoidably slows down fossil phaseout.

    • Those plants were very old and already had their lifespan extended a couple times (for a lot of money). Ultimately they were decommissioned before the next end-of-life date, which perhaps was a bit early, but keeping them open indefinitely just wasn’t feasible.

      • sensiblepuffin@lemmy.funami.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Consider the downtime if they had decommissioned with the idea of building a new plant in the future. The future would look much less uncertain when it comes to energy needs.