• ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    And your evidence for the bold claim that the French justice system has been corrupted enough to fabricate and enter false evidence and land a conviction?

    What about evidence that french media freedoms have been suppressed so badly that every single news agency has been intimidated into not revealing leaked evidence of fabrication?

    • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I never said it was corrupted. I said in general, courts van be corrupted. See the supreme court of the USA for a recent example.

      • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ok, but in general so can any organisation/institution become corrupted. So can your local authority or the upper management of where you work or the local school board or the organisers of your favourite activity club.

        Your statement is tantamount to saying “corruption exists and is bad”. Well yeah, it has since people put a name to greed.

        Its good to keep an eye out for it, but unless there’s growing evidence for the case that French courts have been corrupted, like how there’s now a mountain’s worth for the US supreme court, then it’s not being skeptical it’s being very cynical.

        • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Finally someone who actually wants a debate.

          I agree that it’s not a problem until it is a problem. I think we differ in the way we are vigilant about defending the core of democracy.

          Open elections, free speech and free press are very important to defend, even if you happen to dislike the person in question. I’d rather defend free speech of a person I hate than slowly carving away at it, one “victory” at a time. If one person doesn’t have free speech, there is no free speech left.

          I see it the same with elections. If anyone can be barred from running in an election, the election isn’t open anymore.

          I don’t see it as skeptical versus cynical. Maybe in your eyes. What I’ve seen lately though is that democracy can be over very quickly, or in a way that no one can stop, even if you can see the signs. Look at USA right now, it’s been going down hill for a while now but most people are realizing too late to do anything.

          I’m not here to discuss France or their politics because I know nothing about it, nor about Le Pen. People seem to go very much into “it’s fine for now in France”.

          It’s fine until it isn’t.