• Durandal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    IIRC GOG is actually partnered with HeroicLauncher… so… it’s semi official to use that… and better UX.

    • iusearchbtw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      heroic has no download throttling, very annoying for shared/shitty networks and large games

    • hellofriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I wouldn’t call HGL a better UX. It straight up doesn’t work for me. When it did, I couldn’t get games to install or update and had to DL manually in browser, install into some other Wine prefix, and then manually move the files to an HGL-generated prefix. The UI looks nicer but it’s not nearly as straightforward as Galaxy’s. It’s more like Lutris in its complexity, though I imagine there’s no easy way around that.

    • RayJW@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Better UX until you have to download or update a game… there is an open bug report where it just doesn’t progress but keeps starting new processes until you‘re OOM. Still no fix in months, I’ve had to boot into Windows for every single update. Really not that good of an UX.

    • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      Affiliate links are not business partnerships. Does Heroic have anything more than that with GOG?

      • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Gog funds Heroic.

        I actually think it’s a fairly decent compromise (although I prefer Lutris), since Gog is clearly not interested in paying to maintain a Linux port.

        • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Gog funds Heroic.

          By some other means than affiliate link payouts? I’m not aware of any such arrangement, but if one exists, can you link some details about it?

          • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            I read it somewhere awhile ago. You’re killing me asking for a source, goddamn.

            EDIT: somewhat ironically, here’s a Reddit thread where a developer says they are a part of the affiliate program, so, I don’t know much funding that brings in. It sounds like a less formal arrangement than I was imagining:

            • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 minutes ago

              Yes, that’s what I thought: It’s just affiliate linking (aka marketing) that any app can use, not a partnership between Heroic and GOG. Thanks for following up and confirming it.

              Quoting /u/imLinguin in the post you linked:

              Heroic dev here. We are just part of the affiliate program since we help people access GOG on Linux easier. There is nothing more, so there is no need for official announcements from the GOG side.

    • im sorry i broke the code@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Better UX is a big word, as any unofficial launcher it kinda sucks because it doesn’t have a specific feature set. Besides, first party support is always better