The original petition failed due to two issues:

  • UK government misinterpreted what the petition is about and didn’t really answered to what was being asked
  • early general elections canceled all ongoing petitions at the time

This attempt has a new, reworded petition to, hopefully, make it simple and clear enough to avoid any additional problems.

There are two thresholds for UK petitions:

  • 10 000 signatures: official government response
  • 100 000 signatures: petition will be considered for debate in Parliament

Here is a video from Ross Scott (the main organizer of the Stop Killing Games initiative) about this update.

  • moody@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    The goal is not to prevent you from agreeing to bad terms, it’s to prevent the companies from imposing those bad terms on people.

    Would you rather buy a game that you know is going to die in a year, or the same game but that can be played for as long as you want?

    Would you rather companies keep making games with a short expiration date, or games that people can keep playing if they so choose?

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Would you rather buy a game that you know is going to die in a year, or the same game but that can be played for as long as you want?

      I would rather I get to make that choice instead of it being imposed onto me. You can make your choice. I can make mine.

        • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          Who would buy cigarettes? Who would buy a Cybertruck? Who would buy meat? Just because you wouldn’t choose it doesn’t mean it’s a choice that must be banned.