- cross-posted to:
- gaming@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- gaming@lemmy.ml
The original petition failed due to two issues:
- UK government misinterpreted what the petition is about and didn’t really answered to what was being asked
- early general elections canceled all ongoing petitions at the time
This attempt has a new, reworded petition to, hopefully, make it simple and clear enough to avoid any additional problems.
There are two thresholds for UK petitions:
- 10 000 signatures: official government response
- 100 000 signatures: petition will be considered for debate in Parliament
Here is a video from Ross Scott (the main organizer of the Stop Killing Games initiative) about this update.
The goal is not to prevent you from agreeing to bad terms, it’s to prevent the companies from imposing those bad terms on people.
Would you rather buy a game that you know is going to die in a year, or the same game but that can be played for as long as you want?
Would you rather companies keep making games with a short expiration date, or games that people can keep playing if they so choose?
I would rather I get to make that choice instead of it being imposed onto me. You can make your choice. I can make mine.
What a joke. Who would ever choose having their shit taken away after a year?
Who would buy cigarettes? Who would buy a Cybertruck? Who would buy meat? Just because you wouldn’t choose it doesn’t mean it’s a choice that must be banned.