cm0002@infosec.pub to Linux@programming.dev · 4 days agoAn upcoming California law requires operating system providers to enforce basic mandatory age verificationwww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square56linkfedilinkarrow-up1226arrow-down16file-textcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldpcgaming@lemmy.caprivacy@lemmy.mlpcmasterrace@lemmit.online
arrow-up1220arrow-down1external-linkAn upcoming California law requires operating system providers to enforce basic mandatory age verificationwww.pcgamer.comcm0002@infosec.pub to Linux@programming.dev · 4 days agomessage-square56linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldpcgaming@lemmy.caprivacy@lemmy.mlpcmasterrace@lemmit.online
minus-squareBrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up47·4 days agoStill fucking stupid and just a slow creep towards some bullshit like “kernel level age verification” where most Linux distros can’t possibly comply because the chip manufacturers won’t work with developers to certify unless they pay a $10,000 fee.
minus-squarepivot_root@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·4 days agoIt’s like Secure Boot but actually, 100% useless.
Still fucking stupid and just a slow creep towards some bullshit like “kernel level age verification” where most Linux distros can’t possibly comply because the chip manufacturers won’t work with developers to certify unless they pay a $10,000 fee.
It’s like Secure Boot but actually, 100% useless.