- Except Pathfinder already switched to “Ancestry” 6 years ago. - Stop trying to act like you’re leading the pack, when the reality is that you’re lagging behind. 
- Makes sense. Pathfinder already shifted over to Ancestries in their 2nd Edition. Paizo has a pretty good history of representation and sensitivity to stuff like this though. 
- I don’t know how this helps anything? People’s disdain for each other is not about what you call it. - Regardless of my understanding though it’s good to see them working to improve the game like this - Race was always a flawed idea. To be honest i think it’s not that bad in a fantasy setting but it can also lead to some weird and uncomfortable stuff and i don’t think there’s a good reason to keep it. - On the flip side, “ancestries” or backgrounds or whatever are a lot more flexible as a concept and let you do some cool stuff. 
- Can’t find the comic at the moment, but it immediately came to my mind: - Dude holds a purple flag
- Sees guy with a yellow flag greeting him
- Looks at his flag
- Thinks “Fuck that guy”
 - People can hate each other for any reason imaginable. Looking differently is just the simplest one. - Extra Fabulous Comics.  
 
- “oh that race doesn’t make good wizards they are less intelligent than others” - With the word race out of the descriptions, its less likely that someone will get mad over something like that. - This is a real example from early 5e that some people got upset over, to the point some people still mention it, acting all wigged out. - Anything that pushes real world politics away from me games is inherently good. - I guess that’s a natural consequence of just having a lot of people on a platform 
 
- “species” is simply more accurate, and makes multiracial games a little less awkward 
 






