• @DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    310
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Holy shit.

    I thought this was just going to be a matter of poor security implementation or crappy feature sets.

    Turns out they converted the company into a loan shark operation owned by Chinese ad companies

    when the Opera browser continued losing users (due to competition from Google and Apple), the company shifted gears to building mobile apps that provided predatory short-term loans. The interest rates on those loans ranged from 365-876% per year, and loan terms from 7-29 days.

    • @dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1565 months ago

      This behavior is just beyond batshit. Before anyone decides tl;dr, the article is well worth a read.

      I had a hunch that Opera was circling the drain when I started seeing them sponsor Youtubers. A general rule of thumb is that no company that has anything worth a shit devolves to sponsoring Youtube videos. I had no idea about the predatory loans thing, or the crypto scam chasing thing, or the ripping off ChatGPT thing…

      Back here in reality, there is no reason anyone should be using any other browser than Firefox. There is one organization left in this arena still devoted to protecting privacy, maintaining open standards, and a fair and open web for all. And it ain’t Google, it ain’t Microsoft, and it ain’t Opera.

      • @fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        795 months ago

        And it’s always been Firefox since day one. Out of the ashes of Netscape Navigator rose Firefox and Mozilla have been one of the only bastions of the free and open web ever since. I honestly don’t understand why anyone would use another browser.

          • @TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -525 months ago

            Actually it’s an effective cloud-based password manager that doesn’t rely on local storage or weird plugins or backups.

            That’s what keeps me using chrome. I could lose everything in a house fire, pick up any device, log in and have access to all my stuff without any further action on my part, right out of the box.

            That’s the only feature I care about, and chrome is the only browser I’ve seen that provides it.

            Get me that in firefox, and I’ll switch today.

            • 📛Maven
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              What are you talking about? Firefox has had literally Sync since before Chrome existed.

              Firefox Sync initial release: December 21, 2007

              Google Chrome intial release: September 2, 2008 (Beta), (1.0) December 11, 2008

              A full year, my guy.

            • Deebster
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I’m confused since Firefox Sync has been letting you sync/backup your passwords, bookmarks and history for a decade or two at this point, and you can even self-host the sync server.

              I don’t know the complete FF password manager details (Bitwarden user here) but where does Firefox fall short for you?

            • @mystik@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              295 months ago

              You can lose your Google account in the blink of an eye with no recourse, no access to support or anything.

              With local and my own backups, I can choose to put them at any location, cloud or local.

            • Swaziboy
              link
              fedilink
              English
              245 months ago

              I have all that functionality today with FF… Not sure when you last checked, but if you create a Mozilla account and log in to FF you can sync all the same stuff as Chrome does.

              • @TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -235 months ago

                Checked it out: apparently I had a mozilla account at one point in time. Hit ‘forgot password’:

                Note: When you reset your password, you reset your account. You may lose some of your personal information (including history, bookmarks, and passwords). That’s because we encrypt your data with your password to protect your privacy.

                Forgot your password: fuck you.

                This is the exact fucking opposite of the behaviour I’d ever want from a password manager.

                • @feannag@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  295 months ago

                  I think that’s what most people want in a password manager. The only way to have a truly secure pw manager is to encrypt it and failsafe to delete. That way if your identity gets stolen or email compromised, it limits the damage.

                • @Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  55 months ago

                  Forgot your password: fuck you.

                  This is the exact fucking opposite of the behaviour I’d ever want from a password manager.

                  Wait wait wait wait, you’re telling me you want the people who hold your password to be able to view them without your explicit permission (entering a secret that unlocks your vault)? Because that’s what you’re asking for - if they can reset your password and provide you your plaintext passwords, that means they can 1) read your passwords if they chose to and 2) you can be phished and have your account stolen and passwords provided to some rando.

                  The convenience offered by that “feature” is outweighed by the potential consequences of it existing. Passwords should absolutely be a Trust No One (TNO) solution.

            • @dasJot@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              75 months ago

              That’s great until Google finds that one picture of your child at the pool and immediately deletes your CSAM-harboring filthy account.

        • @TORFdot0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          85 months ago

          Sadly chromium is often the only supported browser for a lot of web apps. Sometimes not even chromium but just chrome in particular. Chrome has basically inherited all the downsides of internet explorer of yesteryear except it doesn’t run like shit yet.

            • @A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              and google sabotaging shit so it only works on their platform.

              Like they did with youtube and Edge (before they finally gave in to googles terrorism and switched edge to chrome base)

              like they are doing with youtube and adblockers.

        • @Wermhatswormhat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          I’ll say this. I use chrome and I KNOW I need to switch to Mozilla. It’s just such a pain to switch that I inevitably go back. Maybe this is the wake up call I need.

        • @Demdaru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          Cuz Firefox was for a long time just some shiiiiiiit. It was overloaded, blocky, seemed outdated etc., so ie wasn’t any worse. When chrome came, whooo.

          Now tho, I am simply still prejudiced against it. And I found Edge suits me ideally so I don’t care for any other browser. Until my adblock stops working, then I’ll run.

          • @foggenbooty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            I also left Firefox for Chrome many years ago during that time period, but Firefox has been good again for quite some time. They did a big refresh called Quantum several years back and solved most of those issues. Give it a try.

            • @rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15 months ago

              They also solved the “issue” of XULRunner and all associated functionality, not offering anything instead.

              I had to move from conkeror, and now jump between FF and SeaMonkey. The latter lags behind a bit in porting FF functionality.

              To each his own, I guess.

      • @hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        205 months ago

        I do not agree with your generalisation of YouTube sponsorships, but with the rest I absolutely agree with.

        Honestly, I read something about Opera being vaguely connected to shady Chinese companies right before I started recommending ppl to switch away from Opera or Opera GX. Glad I stuck to that, looks like my intuition did not fail me.

        • @dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          65 months ago

          You, uh, really feel that the likes of Raid: Shadow Legends, Nord VPN, Honey by PayPal, Raycons, and HelloFresh are really making a positive contribution to the world that we can’t do without?

          • @Syrc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 months ago

            I mean, what’s the problem with NordVPN? Pretty much every youtuber I respect who does sponsorship promotes it, and I’ve never heard anything bad about it. Generalizing like that is always bad (or well, mostly always, or ironically I would be generalizing).

          • @obbelusk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            I think there might be a few exceptions, but generally it’s just loot boxes and predatory games.

      • Engywuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -13
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        there is no reason anyone should be using any other browser than Firefox.

        Yeah. And everybody should use the same brand of shoes, drive the same model of car, buy at the same store, eat the same food…

        God forbids people having different tastes, opinions and needs.

        There is one organization left in this arena still devoted to protecting privacy, maintaining open standards, and a fair and open web for all. And it ain’t Google, it ain’t Microsoft, and it ain’t Opera.

        Yeah, and it’s not Mozilla either.

        • @fernandofig@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yeah, and it’s not Mozilla either.

          Which one do you think it is, then? Genuinely curious here. I don’t disagree with on most of what you said - I find the simping for Mozilla (and sneering towards chromium) here in Lemmy rather annoying. Mozilla and its browser both have shortcomings as well, and choosing a web browser these days is, as most things in life, choosing the lesser of evils vs. one’s own needs.

          • Engywuck
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -2
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Which one do you think it is, then? Genuinely curious here.

            I simply don’t assume that an org/com actually exist which is concerned users’ privacy. Mozilla just follows the money, as any other corp.

            Protecting my privacy is a task I prefer to delegate to mybrain(.org).

      • @takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        255 months ago

        Yeah, I was a huge fan but the moment they changed the engine it was just Chrome in different skin. And later the news that they were bought by a Chinese firm doing shady stuff just confirmed that it was the right decision.

        I am sad that they did not open source the engine. Somebody leaked it, but no one serious would touch it for legal reasons.

        • @rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          For me old Opera is an artifact of the bygone era, together with old Skype and Hamachi, when some proprietary software would really work well and even support Linux.

          Opera actually even released FreeBSD versions, if I’m not mistaken.

          Skype - we all know what.

          Hamachi still works =)

      • @Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 months ago

        Yeah the surprise in this thread is surprising to me. I’ve considered Opera to be untrustworthy for years now.

  • @lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1665 months ago

    I knew not to use Opera GX as soon as they started sponsoring youtubers. I swear, youtube sponsorships are like anti-ads. 9 times out of 10 they’re doing something sketchy.

    • @CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      725 months ago

      When I see a product I already use being promoted by YouTubers in sponsored segments, I immediately question if I should be using it, even if I’d have happily continued had I never seen that sponsorship.

      • Neshura
        link
        fedilink
        English
        415 months ago

        Absolutely true. I remember every YouTuber and their mother shilling out for LastPass a few years back. Now that their reputstion is kind of in the dumps after several “noncritical” hacks I see those same YouTubers shilling out for Dashlane.

        It just gets worse if you try to think of any serious sponsorship program by companies that are, to date, trustworthy. There are none because they don’t need them. Word of mouth is good enough for them because the customers they have will stay being customers for a long time. Long enough that they bring in more people just by being happy about the service.

        • Funwayguy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          175 months ago

          Same with Express/Nord VPN sponsorships. Many people debunked the adverising BS they were spinning about blocking tracking when really it only masked a tiny subset.

          As someone who studied infosec, those ads were infuriating. Now I just sponsor block it all because I’m beyond tired of it.

          • Neshura
            link
            fedilink
            English
            135 months ago

            Really like Mullvad for that. They don’t pretend a VPN alone makes you invisible for tracking nor do they pretend it makes your browsing much more secure. They don’t do any BS sales either. You get what you pay for and they are very upfront about what you get (mostly ISP block and region lock bypass).

            Haven’t seen a YT sponsorship for them yet either so that’s another plus in my book.

        • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I left LastPass as soon as they started screwing with the free product. Same with Evernote. It’s fine to make a non-free product. But if you make a free product with premium settings you can’t go back and pinch the original user base by taking features away. Those companies *products always fail.

    • @AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      325 months ago

      Lol, now that I think of it I had never seen a YouTube ad or sponsor where I would say “this is an ethical and fairly priced product without a catch that I would like to buy”…

      • lad
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        I only saw a decent product once, it was Henson razor. Not sure if it’s ethical and fairly priced (those are somewhat hard to tell, imo). If I weren’t using it already, the sponsorship would have deterred from trying 😅

    • @akrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      I swear, youtube sponsorships are like anti-ads. 9 times out of 10 they’re doing something sketchy.

      We’re the minority though.

    • @FrostKing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      Agreed. I think (and I’m not sponsored lol) that the only product from YouTube that’s actually good is Harry’s razors

  • @thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1405 months ago

    Opera invested $30 million in the crypto startup ICST that same year, and the startup’s CEO was arrested four days later for financial crimes.

    LOL

  • kingthrillgore
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Explain why don’t just clickbait me.

    Man its fucking sad what’s become of Opera. They gave us tabbed browsing, CSS, and lots of other stuff and then just like that, they became another uninteresting Chromium fork and its been straight to the shitter since.

    • @kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      505 months ago

      Many of the O.G. Opera devs founded Vivaldi after Opera was sold to Chinese investors. It’s Chromium, but it has a considerable number of excellent power user features

      • @gnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        185 months ago

        I believe they also have plans to move beyond Chromium, but a new code base isn’t a quick project… (That said, they do eliminate the tracking features and other questionable elements of the code currently.)

    • dantheclamman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      125 months ago

      Why is it clickbait? I don’t understand. The article explains the reasons. They don’t fit in the headline.

    • wagoner
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      I had an @operamail email account for years, I was all in!

  • @ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    635 months ago

    Hindenburg is an investment firm that researches publicly-traded companies and shorts their stocks if they find sufficient evidence of investor fraud before releasing its report.

    What a wild business plan. I’m amazed it’s legal.

    • @PilferJynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      375 months ago

      It’s kinda scummy to manipulate the market as such, but it’s much more scummy to partake in the fraud.

    • @deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      Short sellers provide benefit to society by finding and shaming doomed businesses so they fail faster and don’t suck up as many resources.

      They also have a proud history of uncovering outright fraud.

      In business, the people complaining loudest about short sellers are emperors with no clothes.

  • @viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    555 months ago

    Opera was effectively the first software I bought, back when they had a trial version in 2001. They had tabbed browsing and mouse gestures, a solid DECADE before they came to any other browser. Lightyears ahead of the competition and worth every penny. I think in 2003 they made it free, and I wasn’t even mad.

    I was forced to switch to Firefox at some point when a website I had to use for work was incompatible due to some Java applet that wouldn’t load properly, and then slowly migrated over.

    Shame to see what happened to this amazing piece of tech.

    • @iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      225 months ago

      It’s really tough to run a business when your competitors are all free as in freedom (Firefox) or free as in funded by monopolistic megacorps (Google, Apple, Microsoft).

    • @erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      135 months ago

      To be fair, Opera in the 2000’s was craming every single feature they could think about in their browser.

      So sure, they got some interesting features before the others but they also had hundreds of useless features cluttering the UI.

      • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        But it was still fast and didn’t gobble up RAM so much (well other than memory leaks, but none of the competitors were free of those either and IE crashing would also crash the desktop because it was the same instance of the same app for some reason).

      • @viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        You bought the ad-free version, they had a small banner on top. And of course there were key generators and such, back in the days there wasn’t any online key validation. Or you could kill the banner with a local proxy. Still, I actually wanted to support the development, just like I donate to good FOSS software now, or buy android apps to remove ads although I’m already killing them all with adaway on a rooted phone.

        Sure, there were free browsers out there, but back then Opera was really way ahead of the bell curve.

    • @rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      I stopped using Opera when they dropped their actual product in favor of yet another Chromium-based something.

    • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25 months ago

      Yeah, that was a depressing discovery. I didn’t see any news about it but one day randomly wondered how opera could afford to develop a free browser that wasn’t FOSS. Digging into it was surprising. Not quite John McAfee surprising, but still sketchy. Like they were in the predatory banking industry and then there were the ties to China. It wasn’t hard to see that it was time to check out Firefox again.

  • MeanEYE
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    445 months ago

    I loved Opera’s own engine. It was snappy and memory efficient. But their developers, at least back then, were very toxic. I remember them releasing a version which broke GMail and other Google products and they all collectively went on vacation saying it’s a non-issue, instead of delaying the release. Any mention of this on forums guaranteed you a permanent ban.

    They only have themselves to blame for user migration and all this controversy.

      • @turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        Opera added a user agent header “selector” pretty early so it would tell the webpage it was chrome/IE/Firefox. It was important for compatibility for a lot of websites. I’d trust that listing less for them much less than I would for the bigger/default browsers.

        The migration from their own codebase to chromium in 2012/2013 was…rough. They were the first browser to have cross-device synch and you couldn’t import bookmarks for a long time, much less RSS feeds/everything else people used Opera for. Their original userbase took a sizeable hit.

        • @iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          Yes, but as a user, there was always a broken webpage somewhere or some API it didn’t support.

          When they switched to blink, I immediately got Firefox and I couldn’t be happier. It’s a browser that cares about my privacy, my choice to use an ad blocker, etc.

      • @wikibot@lemmy.worldB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        Here’s the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

        The usage share of web browsers is the portion, often expressed as a percentage, of visitors to a group of web sites that use a particular web browser.

        to opt out, pm me ‘optout’. article | about

    • @rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I remember them releasing a version which broke GMail and other Google products

      I remember that it was Google which intentionally made their sites non-functional with Opera. And that changing user agent alone was sufficient to make them work. I may be mistaken, of course.

      EDIT: But yes, their developers were like that.

  • @fne8w2ah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    435 months ago

    Vivaldi Browser is headed by some of the original founders of Opera ASA and is a reasonably good alternative to Google Chrome, MS Edge, Safari and new Opera itself.

    Alternatively, use Gecko-based browsers such as Firefox/Waterfox/Iceraven.

  • @selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    They did some awesome browsers back in the early 2000s. I couldn’t think about browsing the web without Opera Mini back then.

    • @COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      195 months ago

      And despite being designed to run on potatoes with a 2G connection it somehow felt just as smooth as modern mobile browsers (at least as I remember it). It’s crazy how well it worked considering the hardware and network limitations of the time.

      • @Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        145 months ago

        Didn’t opera cache images on their server and feed you a lower res version instead of what the website had? Granted with the limited bandwidth available back then, that was fine but now I don’t think many people would want that.

        • @COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          125 months ago

          Exactly this. Lower resolution and added compression. You could click to view full version if needed, but this was a feature as it meant faster loading and a small fraction of the data usage.

        • @privatizetwiddle@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          75 months ago

          In Opera Mini, yes. They also had a less popular but nearly identical browser, Opera Mobile, which didn’t do the proxying and compression. I had an unlimited data plan back then, so I always used Mobile. The performance was great even without compression.

      • kratoz29
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        I remember an ex-girlfriend daily driving it on her phone for all kinds of communications, so maybe this is why she preferred it, I never wondered why, I was very happy with my Linux machine and I barely used my mobile phone at those times anyway.

      • @selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        Amazing piece of software. Reliable on the server side, agile and full of features on the mobile side. And they even made sure that sites like Twitter and Facebook could be used in the browser. What a pity the Opera branding ended like this.

    • cum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      125 months ago

      I don’t know if there are any Opera GX fanboys lol

    • Kayn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 months ago

      Why would we need them to switch? Shouldn’t we just leave them be if they’re happy that way?

      • @FoxBJK@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        65 months ago

        Firefox’s total global market share is 3.3%. They’re practically losing their influence over the web with numbers that small. So while I’m generally in favor of letting people access the web however they’d like, I’m not naive to the idea of advocating for the little guy.

        • megane-kun
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          More importantly, using Firefox (or any of its forks) would mean less people are dependent on Google’s Chromium. With less people depending on Google’s Chromium, the less Google can swing its weight around, imposing its dictum on unsuspecting users.